User talk:Charleslechien

Speedy deletion nomination of Digital Casting


A tag has been placed on Digital Casting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 20:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Joey Rubenstein
Hi, I'm Robertgombos. Charleslechien, thanks for creating Joey Rubenstein!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Could you make a new section? You might want to use the second paragraph.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Robert G. (talk) 06:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey! Robertgombos - Thank you so much for your very kind help and suggestion! I have been on vacation but I will be back over the weekend and will do as you suggested! I actually am so glad you reached out because I was curious about something going on on a page I have been thinking about improving for the celebrity Tyler Henry and didn't know who to ask - but maybe you'll know! I read his book and got curious about him and of course found the wiki article about him (articles) - but OMG - who ever is editing it seems to have it out for Tyler! There's nothing really about the actual accomplishments, just loads of negativity. And then when I looked at the conversation going on about the article there were a handful of editors who clearly hate this guy and want to ridicule him - which seems like the exact opposite of what this beautiful Wiki system should be about!!

Like for instance, in the discussion about merging (its the tag on the very top of his page) you can see the same editors making really really biased and crude remarks, and then fighting anyone who is trying to make the article neutral -

"Merge to the TV show article, where the scoundrel has become notable - good job bilking the celebs too. -Roxy the dog. bark 15:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)" and "I can see Henry gaining more and more of a following and being involved with other projects perhaps for decades,(what did Barnum say about suckers?)"

Anyway - I don't know who to reach out to - but it seems really really off what these editors are doing and so against what makes wiki so great! Any thoughts? Charleslechien (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Robert G. - I just took a few minutes to make a quick improvement on Joey Rubenstein, I'll be adding one more section next week when I have more time, but did I do as you asked? And is it cool if I remove your tag? Again - THANK YOU - so grateful to get guidance! I'm eager to be a welcomed contributor and want to do everything right! :-) Also, I ended up starting a discussion in the tree house about the other page I mentioned - but I would still love you to take a look at what the 'bullies' appear to be intentionally doing that seems so against Wiki standards and I just don't want to get in over my head!... Charleslechien (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Teahouse
I undid your edit to the teahouse because you overwrote the last week's worth of edits by other editors. You need to make your edits to the latest version of the page, not the version from last week. Meters (talk) 19:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Meters - Sorry, not understanding what I did wrong. Here to learn, so, what? :-) Charleslechien (talk) 23:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Here's your actual edit . This is a very busy page and threads get archived 3 days after the last response. You came back a week after the last response (long after your thread had been archived), and not finding the thread, opened the version of the page that had been edited by the person who responded to you, added your comment, and then saved the page (ignoring the warning that you were overwriting material) . You erased a week's worth of edits (more than 600 messages) by other editors. Don't ever do that. Meters (talk) 23:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carter Reum
Hello Charleslechien,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carter Reum for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dysklyver 16:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)