User talk:Charlespotenza

RE
The reason why I removed the names you listed in the "Associated Acts" because they were only one-time collaborations. This is would make the field redundant space to list EVERY single collaboration an artist has performed with. It is better to simply list artists in which they have collaborated more several times. For example, Lil Wayne would have a long list of "Associated Acts" if we included every single collaboration. However, they are mentioned in the artist's discography, with a bit more detail. It keeps the articles from having excessive data. BTW, if you followed what you do on the "Associated Acts", you are missing a lot of artists to put, like B.o.B would have Cobra Starship, Hayley Williams, Eminem, Rich Boy, Charles Hamilton, Bun B, OJ da Juiceman, Ludacris, Royce da 5'9"... seriously, it just becomes a useless list. However, if I made the error of removing the artists you mentioned from tours and long-time collabs, then mention them on the Edit Summary and I apologize for it. -- Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I understand what you mean. I will only include artists that are significantly associated, like a tour or many contributions.

Speedy deletion nomination of G.R.I.N.D.
A tag has been placed on G.R.I.N.D. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Endofskull (talk) 22:17, 24 August 2010 (UTC) Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)