User talk:Charleypreacher

Welcome!
Hello, Charleypreacher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page ECO (denomination) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! YBG (talk) 00:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Keeping references up to date
It is great that you want to update the number of statistics on ECO (denomination). I recently modified the reference to include correct cite web template, with the url= and accessdate= parameters. All information added or modified in wikipedia must be reliably sourced. When you don't update the accessdate= parameter, it isn't clear to other editors where you got the revised information -- it could be the same url or it could be a different source entirely. It seems to me that merely updating the "(as of mm-dd-yy)" is not sufficient to assure other editors that you really got the new information from the same source as before. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask me either here or on my talk page. I notice that your edits are usually from your mobile; it may be more difficult to edit the cite web template from a mobile device. If that is the case, and you can't figure it out, let me know and I'll try to find the answer for you. Thanks again for your desire to keep WP up-to-date! YBG (talk) 00:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)