User talk:CharlieAnderson21

January 2016
Hello, I'm Superbeecat. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Andrew Garfield— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 01:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Keaton. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Michael Keaton was changed by CharlieAnderson21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97829 on 2016-01-26T19:45:23+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam West, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Adam West was changed by CharlieAnderson21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930536 on 2016-01-27T15:52:40+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny DeVito. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Garfield, you may be blocked from editing. Eagleash (talk) 15:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)