User talk:CharlieDelta/Archive 3

Nakazato / Tanikawa
Hello! I've responded at Talk:Katsuhito Nakazato to your comment there. -- Hoary (talk) 10:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Perfectly fine.
Cheers! -- j &#9883; e decker  talk  22:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Christopher Pike
I just spent a while updating and organizing this page. I added loads of references, as many as I could find. Let me know what you think. Clarkkent420 (talk) 01:44, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I can see that you've done a lot of work on this. Well done! A reclusive author is a difficult subject to work on.  I'll have a look at this in more detail as soon as I can.  A couple of things occur to me from a first quick look: the first few paragraphs of the biography are really too close to comfort to the biblio.com biography and would set up copyright violation alarms. I wasn't aware of this when I tagged the page back in Feb.  It is possible that the biblio.com biography was initially copied from Wikipedia but the safest thing to do woulld be to rewrite the information in your own words.  Next: generally, fan blogs are not regarded as reliable sources. I would be inclined to remove the line about what fans thinks he's writing next, or rewrite it to make it clear that this is fan speculation.  Similarly, I have seen links to Facebook pages removed from pages as links to social networking sites or fan sites tend to be frowned upon. Finally (for the moment), you might like to consider creating and using your own  sandbox. If there's a lot of work to do on an article, you can copy the existing page to your sandbox, work on it there and transfer it back to Mainspace when you have finished and are happy with it. Hope this is enough to go on right now. Let me know if there is anything else I can help with.  I've removed the multiple issues tag.  That doesn't mean that the article is completely OK, it's just not screaming out for attention (once you fix the possible copyright violation).--Plad2 (talk) 06:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Children and Young Adult's literature Newsletter - October 2010
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Children's literature at 00:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC).

Talkback
Cheers,  Diego Grez (talk) 20:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

winkle
Hi Plad, I saw your question  on  WereSpielChequers talk  page. If you are still not sure that you  are getting  the full  benefit out of the automation  that  Twinkle is supposed to  do, don't  hesitate to  ask me on  my  talk  page. There is also a script  that  will  even automatically  add all  the delsorts to  a AfD. --Kudpung (talk) 05:49, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Children and Young Adult's literature WikiProject Newsletter - Issue 3
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Children's literature at 18:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC).

And now I need your help...
Hi! I wonder if you could take  a look  at  this. I know we have to AGF  but  this looks so typically  like something  we all  know in  all  books, especially  based on  the cited source and page number,  that  I  am  inclined to  think  that  it  might  possibly  be  a WP:copyvio. Your very  special  experience, and your access to  print  media that  I  don't  have here in  Thailand, will  be of utmost  importance. Humble thanks in advance. --Kudpung (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it is correct to AGF in this case. This editor appears to have contributed positively to a number of Beatrix Potter articles.  Potter seems to be the chief area of this editor's interests, which might explain why the Potter book has been used as the only reference.  On the other hand, the text certainly reads like the kind of bio one finds in a book and I think you are right to have a concern.  Personally, I would have thought a note on the editor's talk page suggesting that it needs more content and references to support the notability (Macdonald has written 6 books and clearly reviews extensively in children's literature) rather than slapping a Template:Cv-unsure on it would be courteous.  If there's no response, I'd template it.  In the meantime, I'll see whether I can dig up something concrete to help.  Or would you like me to deal with it?--Plad2 (talk) 06:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And I've found a couple of RS which could be used to expand and support WP:N if needed.--Plad2 (talk) 07:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Would you mind handling it? Copyright is not my  forté, but  I  do  realise it's very  easy  to innocently  'borrow' something. I mean, she might even written it herself for the book, but  I wouldn't  be sure if that  allows it to be reused on  the Wikipedia. With your background, and possible access to the print  media concerned,  you're  far better qualified than I  am.  --Kudpung (talk) 08:15, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Will do when I get back tonight.--Plad2 (talk) 08:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)