User talk:CharlieJ385/Choose an Article

Sourcing heads up
Hi there, one of our sourcing tools noticed that a few of the sources on your sandbox draft don't meet Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sources. In particular Research Gate because it allows preprints and may or may not contain unpublished, self-published, or predatory materials. Other unreliable sources include Weebly, Blogspot, and Fandom. Those are all blogs, which allow contributors to post whatever they want, which the Wikipedia community does not consider reliable. I would recommend removing those sources and finding more reliable sources. It's not always easy to tell what a good sources vs what isn't. In this case one of our sourcing tools identified this as an unreliable source. If you want a refresher on reliable sources, you may recall that the Evaluating articles training module discusses examples of what is a good source and what isn't. If you have any question, feel free to let me know. Will (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2022 (UTC)