User talk:CharlieOQ

Kilgour–Matas_report
I suggest look at the changes between these versions https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kilgour%E2%80%93Matas_report&diff=654167391&oldid=653676293

I have deleted 5 references to Epoch Times (down from 7 to 2). I haven't deleted info that supports the CCP's view.Aaabbb11 (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm talking about the views you deleted from Thomas Lum, Harry Wu, Glen McGregor and so on. These are important viewpoints that should be given representation (due weight) in the article. - CharlieOQ (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * You removed all voices questioning the credibility of the report, leaving only the mention of CCP's own denial of the allegation. That doesn't sound like NPOV editing to me. -CharlieOQ (talk) 14:30, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The Thomas Lum info on your version is a misrepresentation of what he wrote. Harry Wu was discussed on Falun Gong talk page. McGregor draws on Wu's statements and hasn't made his mind up. They are all individuals. None of them appear on Falun Gong. Lum is used for one reference on Falun Gong Aaabbb11 (talk) 17:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * They are individuals, but they are also notable individuals who did significant research into the allegations (esp. Thomas Lum and Harry Wu, who had the connections in Liaoning to carry out real investigations). Taken together, they represent a GROUP of experts who hold skeptical views towards the report and should be given due weight in the article. I stress again that these views together REPRESENT A VOICE, and shouldn't be simply regarded as isolated individuals.


 * Interestingly and ironically, in your version of the article, you retained views from Kirk C. Allison, Tom Treasure, Yosef Shalom Eliashiv and so on. ARE THEY NOT INDIVIDUALS?? You are clearly contradicting yourself. The fact is you are only selecting views from individuals who support your own belief, and discarding those who go against it. -CharlieOQ (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

There is discussion on the KM report talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kilgour%E2%80%93Matas_report I suggest you participate before reverting any more edits. Aaabbb11 (talk) 00:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

You're invited to the Teahouse.
Hello CharlieOQ, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! I want to invite you to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. I hope you see you there! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. @ 02:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Institute of Physics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)