User talk:CharlieWinters

Welcome!
Hello, CharlieWinters, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The religion of Winters, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of The religion of Winters


A tag has been placed on The religion of Winters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The church of Winters


A tag has been placed on The church of Winters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mr. Vernon (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at The church of Winters, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Mr. Vernon (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The church of Winters


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The church of Winters, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Iago Qnsi (talk) 18:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at The church of Winters. Mr. Vernon (talk) 18:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Southwater village
Hello CharlieWinters,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Southwater village for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Southwater.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mduvekot (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * You contested this deletion, and in fact the title was not deleted but is now a "redirect", meaning that anyone searching on "Southwater village" will now see the article about Southwater that was there already. Your article may have used different words from the existing one, but you see we don't allow what are called "content forks", where there are different articles dealing with the same topic. Your better course would have been to add to the existing article, except that phrases like "[The] country park is a real jewel" and "You can fish, sail, canoe..." belong in a tourist guide, not an encyclopedia. We ask for factual and verifiable information, expressed neutrally and if possible supported with references to published information. I see you're having trouble attempting to contribute new articles, and would recommend you re-read Your first article before proceeding further Noyster (talk),  12:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)