User talk:Charlie Golightly

Welcome!
Hi Charlie Golightly! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Regarding your changes to Adeney: Wikipedia goes with sources. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

I reverted the others, please find consensus first, and go lightly. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 15:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your edits fall so far outside the bounds of neutral point of view and plain common sense that I think a block is in order here. If you're being serious, see the essay Beware of the tigers; if you're not, which I strongly suspect, you are not welcome here. Graham 87 15:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I edited the phrasing to GNL. How is gender-neutral language not a neutral point of view? My edits are less biased, less controversial, and more patently "neutral". Such is the basis of GNL-adjustments. My edits are fully within common sense. It's possible that there are simply that many articles that require a neutral point of view, adjusting from the biased language to GNL. Charlie Golightly (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I explained above that Wikipedia goes with the sources. If the sources use "he" for a subject, Wikipedia has to use "he" for facts referenced by those sources. Anything else is "original research", a no-no. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)