User talk:Charliebaiatu

Welcome!
Hello, Charliebaiatu, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 02:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sue Barker has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sue Barker was changed by Charliebaiatu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956362 on 2016-01-18T01:53:54+00:00.

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Sue Barker. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. ''Material should not be removed just because you feel it is offensive. If it's sourced, you should leave it in the article and see if there's consensus to remove it.'' —C.Fred (talk) 02:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sue Barker. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''You claimed that a quotation is "wrong" when you removed it, yet it agrees exactly to the source. You need to provide more explanation for the changes you want to make and before you make them. Otherwise, your edits–especially the wholesale deletions—will be dealt with as intentional disruption.'' —C.Fred (talk) 02:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sue Barker. —C.Fred (talk) 02:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)