User talk:Charliechalks

Welcome!
Hello, Charliechalks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Laura Snapes did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Οἶδα (talk) 09:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm JPxG. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Laura Snapes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. jp×g 09:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi
If it makes you feel like we are on more level ground, my real name is [redacted] and I am a [redacted] who edits Wikipedia in my spare time (go ahead, look up my LinkedIn). I don't have any editorial authority over the articles here (at least not any more than anyone else does). Anyway, I understand the things you are saying about this article being a pile of crap, and I think that the AfD is proceeding toward a consensus of delete/trim (at least my !vote was) -- it is probably going to end up with the thing you want to happen happening. With my heart full of deep empathy and agreement, I advise you to stop doing stuff like removing thousands of bytes from the article and casting multiple !votes on the AfD -- there is a very well-established route that these processes take, and there are good reasons it takes a week to happen. The reason there's such resistance to your actions isn't because people here are trying to fuck you over -- it's because the typical scenario where this happens is something like this: football players having DUI convictions disappear from their articles / energy conglomerates having their oil wells and coal plants disappear from articles to be replaced with their "commitment to clean energy" / state legislators having news articles about them accepting bribes silently disappear from the article / et cetera. At any rate, I agree with what you are trying to say, but I am afraid that if you keep going ham like this you will end up getting blocked or something; please stay safe online. jp×g 10:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)