User talk:Charlotte135

Industrial and organizational psychology
I think the section on training and outlook in the entry on industrial and organizational psychology is poor. Is there a branch of psychology that does not require "intense training" as the entry indicates as of today, Jan. 2, 2016? What is it about i/o being "intricate and complex"? Another editor, not I, added the banner that indicates that the section reads like a press release. I think the entire section should be removed. A tacky subsection covers the pros and cons of pursuing a career in i/o psychology ("Many career opportunities with a Master's-level degree" versus "Many positions require doctoral degrees"). I think the section on training and outlook should be deleted? If another editor wants to create a better section, she or he should proceed. The entire section as it stands today is an embarrassment. Iss246 (talk) 08:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you Charlotte135 for your careful work on the training section of the i/o psychology section. It is much improved. Iss246 (talk) 04:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Not a problem at all. I hope it has made an improvement.Charlotte135 (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Charlotte135, please keep up the good work on the industrial and organizational psychology entry. It is slowly improving. Iss246 (talk) 19:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Charlotte135, please give my comments on the Talk:Industrial-and-organizational-psychology‎ page regarding occupational health and safety your consideration. Specifically, we should include Bryan's overview of the history of i/o's interest in health and safety. Iss246 (talk) 14:57, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have made comments on the talk page. Please comment there too.Charlotte135 (talk) 03:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Charlotte135. Iss246 (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into your local language via meta

Thanks again :-) --  Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Charlotte135 is ✅ to . I checked the latter account after it was blocked for trolling Flyer reborn and Mathglot. While checking their range, I find that you are a technical match. Comparisons in behavior, article subjects/interests and writing style are similar. Coupled with your troubled past history which largely is with Flyer and Mathglot, I find it compelling enough to block this account indefinitely.