User talk:CharlotteVanBuylaere

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! nonsense ferret  15:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Angelo Vermeulen


The article Angelo Vermeulen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 22:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angelo Vermeulen


A tag has been placed on Angelo Vermeulen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  17:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Biomodd Workshop Maribor (2010).jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Biomodd Workshop Maribor (2010).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Angelo Vermeulen. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  00:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Biomodd workshop at Maribor.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Biomodd workshop at Maribor.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 19:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Angelo Vermeulen, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  14:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Angelo Vermeulen, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. ''There's a difference between verbatim copying and plagiarism which you yourself have admitted that you've done. We need to deal with that. removing these templates after changing a few words changes nothing. See WP:COPYVIO.''  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  20:44, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Could you please regard this copyright warnings. I've checked the so called copied texts and removed everything what could be interpreted as being copied or changed it so much that it doesn't look like the original text anymore. I'm still learning, this is my first article. If there are still be copyright violations after regarding the article, then please concretize a bit more on which sentences it goes.
 * I just wanted to advise that you are often more likely to get a reply at the users talkpage rather than your own - try User_talk:OlYeller21 --nonsense ferret  17:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I have responded here.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  18:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)