User talk:Charlotte Eden-Gerson

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ian Gawler, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=491370483 here]. Xionbox₪ 12:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * This material on the controversy created by Ian Gawler's ex-wife is dominating the page on him. This distorts the information about him.She has an IT expert assisting her with continual review and referencing of the parts she is putting in which makes it very difficult for Ian Gawler and the people that he works with. They do not have the time and the resources to fix the page and then have it changed again and again.
 * Please remove the para's which are about the media controversy or minimise them the a line or two. Ian Gawler has helped thousands of people for 30 years with cancer and multiple sclerosis and other major illness. Read the biography - The Dragon's Blessing and you will see how distorted the wiki page is.


 * A number of things: 1. The information about the "controversy" is notable and is adequately referenced. 2. Wikipedia does not censor such information simply because some people don't like it.  3. There are editing policies in place to try and ensure that controversies are not given more weight in the article than needed. 4. An editor being an "IT expert" is not able to manipulate articles any more than anyone else. 5. If you think that the article is biased then bring up your concerns on the talk page and / or the Biography of Living Persons Noticeboard for the consideration of other editors.  Nothing will be be achieved by the kind of Conflict Of Interest editing that you are currently engaged in. Afterwriting (talk) 10:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Fair enough. I did not know of the avenues for changing the slanted representation of Ian Gawler's history. I will do as you have suggested.