User talk:Charlysotelo187

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Whataboutism, you may be blocked from editing. PLEASE STOP REMOVING WELL SOURCED INFO. Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 15:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Whataboutism. Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 15:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Whataboutism, you may be blocked from editing.  Crazy Boy  826  15:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

"The malicious removal of encyclopedic content, or the changing of such content beyond all recognition, without any regard to our core content policies of neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), verifiability and no original research, is a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia. "

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Crazy Boy  826  15:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Important notices
~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

If you continue to violate Wikipedia's policies, such as the policy against edit warring or for civility, you will be topic banned from these areas. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:19, 27 May 2020 (UTC)