User talk:Charmeyn

Lindsay Ashford
Wikipedia's external link policy is that a subject's personal/official site should be linked. Therefore, his personal site will be linked. If his site has anything illegal on it, he has helpfully provided a form so you can report it to the police with minimal effort.Chris Croy 22:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The user's actions lead to the article remaining vandalised (or at leat scarred) for a relatively long time. Maybe we should ban the user, or add this article to PAW if it isn't already --Jim Burton 17:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Man Chris you must be real gullible to think that the link to report to the police on Lindsay Ashford's site is actually going to be sent to the police, let me fill you in, it's a fake C.

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -Will Beback · † · 00:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The said either does not have good faith in improving WP, or otherwise is far too destructive to care about not blocking. --Jim Burton 17:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007
Hi, the recent edit you made to Lindsay Ashford has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gurchzilla 08:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

St. Matthew's Cathedral Brandon Manitoba
Hi Unforgettableid,

I see you as one of the editing contributor's to a Wiki page regarding St. Matthew's Cathedral in Brandon, Manitoba.

I have added some information to this article regarding the architect who designed this church, W.A. Elliott, to give a clearer historical reference to who this man was and his other architectural structures that still exist in Brandon Manitoba ; I have made these edits because I have a personal connection to this man, I'm his great-grand daughter and I feel that like any other piece of history that when a person's name is given in reference to something they have done it is common to include other things that person had done; like for example an encyclopedia would make mention of a famous artist's painting the encyclopedia would also include references to that artists other work's as well and not simply focus on that one artist's painting.

So I have a problem as to why, after I include the information I have provided regarding W.A. (William Alexander) Elliott and links to some of his other building's that he has designed, this Wiki article keeps being reverted back to not include this information when a person's name has been clearly given to warrant including some reference to that individual? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charmeyn (talk • contribs) 03:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't know. Try asking at Help desk.  Cheers, --unforgettableid | talk 15:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lindsay Ashford (activist)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lindsay Ashford (activist). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Lindsay Ashford (activist). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)