User talk:Charmquark2

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Charmquark2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Charmquark2/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Charmquark2/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Charmquark2/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:02, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

New York Times Non-Fiction Best Sellers of 1999
My apologies for not getting back sooner - sometime real life has a habit of getting in the way.

There are certain basic standards for articles on Wikipedia - including that the subject should have significant coverage in multiple independent verifiable secondary sources. Having an article about a list on the New York Times, with the sole reference being from the New York Times (which is a primary source) doesn't satisfy that basic criteria. Just because there are other similar articles, which lack independent references, is not a sufficient reason to substantiate your article (refer Other stuff exists). That is not to say that your draft article isn't notable it just needs supporting sources/references.

If you need any help/clarification let me know. Dan arndt (talk) 07:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Charmquark2/sandbox


Hello, Charmquark2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)