User talk:Charteca

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 11:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, this is regarding my edits in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_online_interactive_charts. The only purpose of this page created in 2015 is to list products (most of which are commercial) and compare them feature by feature. At the moment the list contains only 5 entries, while there are many more products that fit this description - “online interactive charts” -perfectly, one can easily come up with a dozen of them after 10 minutes of googling. So, the article is incomplete. I do admit that I added an entry about the product I have some affiliation with, and I was honest and upfront about it (see my username). Apparently, this approach isn’t working. The problem I see here is: we have a Wikipedia article that promotes multiple commercial products (deliberate or not, this is promotion) for free, but the process of accepting new list entries lacks transparency. Since commercial interests are involved, I would consider either making this kind of articles open for editing by everyone and mark it with a “this article may contain promotional material” disclaimer, or removing all articles of this kind altogether to keep Wikipedia truly unbiased.

On a more realistic note: I think I have some knowledge in this field and can share it with the community. I will be happy to make a bigger contribution by reviewing a few more products that will make a good addition to this article and adding more than one entry to the list. Will this kind of edit be accepted? I want to play by the rules, please help me do so. Thanks!