User talk:Charvest/archive2

Speedy deletion of Steven Roman
A tag has been placed on Steven Roman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  22:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Mathematicians
I have moved List of basic details for notable mathematicians to WikiProject Mathematics/mathing missematicians. It would also look better formatted as a table with just one line per person. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Moved further to WikiProject Mathematics/missing mathematicians; hope it looks better. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 15:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

N-ary groups
I've noticed that you added quite some material on n-ary groups to the group (mathematics) article. I felt that it held too much technical detail for that article. A lot of effort has gone into making that article as accessible as possible to an as broad as possible audience. (which has lead to the article reaching "featured" status). Also that article is already quite long, so there isn't much room to go into the details of all possible generalizations.

I have used the material you added to create a new stub article n-ary group, and reduced the material in the group article to a few lines. Since you seem to interested in this subject please don't hesitate furhter expand the new n-ary group article. (It would be nice if you could some history and applications to it.)

As a side note, you might want to look at some of the formatting mark-up I added to your material. It might be useful as you continue to edit math articles. Although different articles can use different conventions it is usually a good idea to follow the convention that is already in place in an article. For more details on mathematical formatting see WP:MOSMATH.(TimothyRias (talk) 13:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC))
 * Thankyou for the comments. For right now, I just wanted to get the main definition of an n-ary group. It'll probably be a while before I make any further edits. Charvest (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Speed of light
Good edit. Made a slight modification though. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 16:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


 * By the way... watch out for these ... ;-) - DVdm (talk) 18:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. tedder (talk) 22:54, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Noncommutative calculus
Hello. By accident i ran across the redirect of Noncommutative calculus to Multiplicative calculus. After reading the article it left me wondering if there is not a better choice for a redirect??? I haven't looked. If not, would you consider creating an article? Henry Delforn (talk) 21:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Feel free to redirect it to noncomgeom if you prefer. Charvest (talk) 15:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Arbitration Request:Speed of light
NOTICE: You have been added as an involved party in Arbitration/Requests/Case. —Finell (Talk) 17:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Speed of light
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Speed of light/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Speed of light/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Hers fold  (t/a/c) 03:59, 9 September 2009 (UTC)