User talk:Chase1635321

Welcome!
Hello, Chase1635321, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

RFCs
I would strongly encourage you not to start another RFC - for one thing the first one is still running. For another, one should generally only start a RFC that will actually resolve the ongoing dispute - and that means soliciting input from others as wording of the RFC that would settle the argument rather than dropping a 'surprise' RFC that folks will just continue arguing with and about. MrOllie (talk) 17:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * You're right, I got confused. I thought that the existing RFC had been sitting there for a week with little engagement (likely because it was a single sentence, so there's little to say about it), but I see that it was created today. I think I got it mixed up with an earlier proposed text. ChaseK (talk) 18:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I would discourage you from reposting any RFC. This is purely a conduct issue and belongs on an administrator noticeboard with topic bans handed out. The review article that I was about to add to the page before it was protected shows that there isn't even any scientific consensus that makes covering the 60 minutes report a WP:WEIGHT problem. FailedMusician (talk) 18:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of HeartMath Institute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HeartMath Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/HeartMath Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BD2412 T 17:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Retired?
I came to your talk page to commend you for your thoughtful comments on the HeartMath AfD! I am sorry you will no longer be editing. Best, Julie JSFarman (talk) 00:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello! I'll be editing under a new account per Clean start. ChaseK (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I am so glad to hear that. Hope that we cross paths again. JSFarman (talk) 00:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)