User talk:Chase Kimble

Welcome!
Hi Chase Kimble! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 20:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

The article is simply a good faith effort to add some overlooked information to the encyclopedia. There was no alternative or cryptic motivate. There is no connection between the writer and subject. The topic is a factual human interest story of achievement similar to many, many other Wikipedia articles. The draft article was seeking to be one of these similarities.

I understand the blockage was due to the impression the article was promotion and/or advertising. This is newbie mistake of over-reinforcing notability. The article will be brought back to conformity immediately after unblock. I respect editorial authority; quality publishing standards must be enforced. I agree that administers have a right to a second guess and expect corrections. So with these guardrails in place, along with an absolute willingness in allying any editorial concerns, this article will meet the publishing standards.

As with many other commentators found in the archive, this newbie had an expectation and an understanding that the point of the “sandbox” was to allow reasonable modeling before to submission. The indefinite block of a sandbox draft with no prior input or warning is amazingly harsh (and certainly discouraging for a newbie}. Nevertheless, as stated before, because of the vested interest to avoid wasting much effort already made, respectfully request article unblock. My goal is to continue work on this BLP that is written “responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone.”

Request for Unblock
. Chase Kimble (talk) 13:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC) Do you have any connection to the subject of your edits? 331dot (talk) 18:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I certify I have zero connection with subject of my draft. I happen on the topic as an encyclopedic oversight, based on other notable Wikipedia peers.
 * I’m guessing, but a source of confusing maybe my user name seems to point to my article. This is a sheer coincidence: the name Chase Kimble is a (poor) computer generate anagram of my real name = Michael Beck. I brainlessly used the anagram at the time of sign up for an account. I plan to apply for a user name change. Chase Kimble (talk) 19:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Are there other topics you want to edit about other than Oja? 331dot (talk) 09:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The goal of my account sign up was to master the steep mark-up learning curve and successful add a single addition to the encyclopedia body.
 * So I’ve put in the work to a point where I’m vested in this current challenge. Even more so now, with allaying editor oversight concerns as part of this mission. Chase Kimble (talk) 13:42, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You may make another unblock request, which someone else will review. Any decision is up to them, not me. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The article is simply a good faith effort to add some overlooked information to the encyclopedia. There was no alternative or cryptic motivate. There is no connection between the writer and subject. The topic is a factual human interest story of achievement similar to many, many other Wikipedia articles. The draft article was seeking to be one of these similarities.
 * I understand the blockage was due to the impression the article was promotion and/or advertising. This is rookie mistake of over-reinforcing notability. The article will be brought back to conformity immediately after unblock.
 * I respect editorial authority; quality publishing standards must be enforced. I agree that administers have a right to a second guess and expect corrections. So with these guardrails in place, along with an absolute willingness in allying any editorial concerns, this article will meet the publishing standards.
 * As with many other commentators found in the archive, this newbie had an expectation and an understanding that the point of the “sandbox” was to allow reasonable modeling before to submission. The indefinite block of a sandbox draft with no prior input or warning is amazingly harsh (and certainly discouraging for a rookie}. Nevertheless, as stated before, because of the vested interest to avoid wasting much effort already made, respectfully request article unblock. My goal is to continue work on this BLP that is written “responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone.” Chase Kimble (talk) 23:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)