User talk:Chase LaFleur

March 2017
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tickler have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   15:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tickler. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tickler was changed by Chase LaFleur (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959739 on 2017-03-09T14:59:55+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tickler, you may be blocked from editing. Cannolis (talk) 15:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chase LaFleur


A tag has been placed on Chase LaFleur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. WNYY98 (talk) 15:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)