User talk:Chase me dinosaurs, I'm an insect

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * No harm intended. I just have to keep track of everyone imitiating me! Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 23:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I'll bite :)
What a curious name. What does it mean? I was unaware that dinosaurs possessed a predilection for chasing insects. If that is what you are, why would dinosaurs want to chase you? Women, for example, are often (for reasons of evolutionary psychology and all that sort of thing) inclined to chase the cavalry. What makes dinosaurs want to chase insects? Perplexedly yours, Wiki Dao  &#9775;  (talk)  05:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest "Chase me dinosaurs, I"m a mammel". It's true from both perspectives. Buggie111 (talk) 14:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely for blatant disruption. (blocked by –MuZemike 02:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The SPI
Ok, if you want to attempt getting Bugs and the other two accounts checked, the place to do that is a separate SPI case. This particular one is to investigate the allegations by other editors that the currently listed accounts are related. File a separate case to have your allegations checked, presenting your evidence for them. Just some advice, because you aren't going to make any headway trying to force it in the current case. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a  message on my talk page. 02:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * This may go without saying, but I urge admins to decline this unblock. The sum total of 'evidence' for either Bugs or the Transhumanist being socks is the following statement: "My main accounts are Baseball Bugs and The Transhumanist. This is a secret. Do not tell anyone or "out" me." Anyone who pretends to believe that this is evidence of sockpuppetry is either wholly incompetent to edit Wikipedia, or is--obviously--a trollsock themselves. → ROUX   ₪  03:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

If you saw a statement "I'm going to kill myself after signing off Wikipedia", you would or should call the police not ignore it. Likewise, I saw a statement and reported it. Both times are likely to be false but you report all suspected crimes.

None the less, blocking forever is way too harsh and please unblock and I will let people trample over me in the socks/Bugs issue and not edit about this. Ok? Chase me dinosaurs, I&#39;m an insect (talk) 03:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Those are entirely different situations, and you know it. Here's a suggestion... why don't you admit who you're a sock of (and any other socks you have laying around) before the CU information gets posted? → ROUX   ₪  03:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Um, no, I looked at all of your edits, as well as the history of the SPI case page. Belittling an admin's decline reason will not get you unblocked.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  03:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's just wait for the checkuser evidence, ok? NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 03:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have looked at all of this account's edits this year, and also at other edits arising out of this accounts activities (e.g. the SPI). There is far more than enough disruptive editing to justify maintaining an indefinite block, with or without checkuser evidence. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do this one small thing
Please don't be mean, please notify Chase me ladies, I'm the Calvery (see my contributions page for a link to his talk page as I wrote to him the other day). That is all I ask.

I am sorry. Please don't block me forever. My understanding is that I am blocked for life for the sockpuppetry policy means I cannot create another account. This is very harsh. I promise to be good. Chase me dinosaurs, I&#39;m an insect (talk) 13:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

ALSO BE STOP LEAVING COMMENTS> YOU CAN EMAIL ME. Chase me dinosaurs, I&#39;m an insect (talk) 13:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * You weren't blocked for sockpuppetry, you were blocked for disruption, which you've already been told several times now. As far as e-mailing, the last thing most of us would want is for you to have our e-mail addresses. However, if the user "Chase me ladies, I'm the CAVALRY" (not "Calvery", which suggests the place where Jesus was crucified) has his e-mail activated [which he does], you could theoretically send him a note and see if he feels like answering. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 14:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * About the only way you could do yourself a favor here, if you honestly care to, would be to follow Roux's suggestion and list every registered account and every IP address you've ever edited under. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 14:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * If you're not going to tell us who you're a sock of, we'll wait for the CU and revoke your talk page access in the meantime. This bantering is a waste of time. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  15:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC)