User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry/New Archives/2014/July

Talkback
FYI, a request has been added. Out of curiosity, what was the policy basis for the protection? All I can find is WP:IAR, which is infrequently applied to page protection. VQuakr (talk) 23:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * My reasoning was that it was the only sensible solution! I didn't want uninvolved editors getting involved. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 21:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2014
Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 22:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Royal Navy personnel in 1983 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Royal Navy personnel in 1983 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Royal Navy personnel in 1983 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

remember
DO you remember this sockpuppet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.186.206 (talk) 14:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Sadly, yes. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 19:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

I think you already knew that both of them are sockpuppets. Thy might have other accounts. 109.157.151.112 (talk) 15:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * They don't. You're evading a block though. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 17:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Yank Barry
Now that, as discussed on the article talk page, the lawsuit has been dismissed, can you please consider unprotecting the article or dropping back to PC/Semi? Thanks! VQuakr (talk) 00:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I see a comment about a new one - but I'll check, sure! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 10:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adding pending charges, just note that you left the article fully protected instead of semi. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  17:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I noticed the pending changes and have removed the full protection. Hope that you don't mind. (If you do, feel free to adjust as necessary.) Mike V  •  Talk  20:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)