User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry/New Archives/2016/March

This Month in GLAM: February 2016
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 21:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

HMS Artful (S121)
In regards to this edit... I don't have a subscription to view that attached source, but either it states the "yard number" or it doesn't. Why is there a question mark (?) in the infobox, next to yard number? - the WOLF  child  17:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That's what the source says, exactly ("Yard No:	1124 ?" - question mark and all... I'm going to try and track down exactly why there's a question mark, but I suspect it'll require a trip to the National Archives or British Library, and thus a day off work. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 23:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * PS - you can get access yourself for free by signing up at Miramar. Well worth it! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 23:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply, (and again in advance for your efforts). Can we leave the info out until it's confirmed either way? It doesn't appear to be very encyclopaedic to add content with a question mark (?), and I'm not sure we can consider it sourced when the source itself doesn't seem to know. Thanks - the WOLF  child  00:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 23:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Page protection requested
I already made this request some while ago at User talk:Materialscientist but he seems too busy to reply.

With the Philippine general election, 2016 currently underway, there is a heightened level of vandalism to BLPs about the major candidates (and other relevant articles). Please protect these articles where puerile vandalism continues at high levels. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mar_Roxas&action=history

(I chose your intriguing name from the list of administrators, but please don't think I'm actually chasing you, Richard - unless you'd welcome that chase of course, huge grin...) BushelCandle (talk) 22:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Józef Stawinoga


The article Józef Stawinoga has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''notable only for (some of) those who lived in the area.

merely making it into the press, does not equal notability.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 09:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)