User talk:Chasehunt1


 * You might have been welcome at Wikipedia, but you are not welcome to begin your career here by repeatedly blinking and re-creating a page as a mere piece of flackery.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * WP:WARNVAND.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * ChaseHunt1 - If you want to be constructive, you can come to the page and add well-sourced material to the material already on the page. You cannot simply erase the entire page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:00, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Chasehunt1 - You need to source everything, to reliable, secondary sources. You also cannot delete without cause all of the reliable material sourced to newspapers that was on the page when you blanked it.  Moreover, if you read the article was it appears before you blanked it, you will see that many positive things were said about Dr. Whitaker's career.  Nevertheless, the fact remains that he came to national  attention as a plagiarist, and that material belongs on the page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Your recent editing history at Matthew C. Whitaker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)