User talk:Chasingsol/Archive 1

Thanks for helping out--24.85.165.161 (talk) 10:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the award
One interesting thing - I'm not sure if you're familiar with New Page Patrol, but this one was at the back of the log. I find it interesting that it slipped through the cracks. Users who do NPP obviously tend to like to look at the pages just created, but there's a lot to take care of at the back of the log. I remember the day I found the infamous film director article, there were like 3-4 other articles that I prod'd/csd'd/afd'd, also in the back of the log. I wonder if part of the user's anger is that the page was around for over a month, so why all the trouble now? A little understandable, but that doesn't mean his article should stay.

Thanks again! --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 18:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. I was not familiar with NPP, but I am now! I actually ran across AFD when I was doing my usual Wiki-surfing (I do a lot). Somehow, I ended up on Glassblowing, which led me to here and then to David Patchen. Curiosity got the better of me, and I checked it out... then wondered why there was an article for someone non-notable... And that started the voyage through figuring out how to nominate an AFD and the rest has proven to be a deeper view in to the workings of Wikipedia than I had anticipated. It is unfortunate that the user [in your submitted AFD, not mine, for clarification] is obviously upset and failing to understand the notability requirements. Looks like it will be WP:SNOW anyway, but yikes... Chasingsol (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Action of 13 January 1797 FAC
Thankyou for participating in the FAC for Action of 13 January 1797. The article has now passed and your assistance in the process was much appreciated. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 11:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you! Your vote for a "Keep" means a lot for me all users in Wikipedia. Also, thanks for the link. I couldn't find it before even if I tried. How did you find it?--Mark Chung (talk) 13:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Mark. Just using Google and it came up. It's on the first page of results using this search. Good luck with your article! --Chasingsol(talk) 13:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

ITs ok
Yeah I was hoping I would have more but it seems that movie was never finished or something so i dont know what happened. Yeah I was actually tryin to delete it earlier myself. lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wufei05 (talk • contribs) 05:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

John Anderson
Well, I guess you're the black sheep of our family since you actually want to help the country articles, many of which have been goin' down hill. So get swingin' and start adding those sources to the article to flesh it out, because it's woefully short. The article's just an old chunk of coal, but it's gonna be a diamond someday. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

IE and Google display problem.
Try this link: it is a google chrome picture of the problem-as you can see, it appears as a print preview display.

http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/6881/screengrabwatchlistbadtm9.png

cheersRead-write-services (talk) 04:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay as suggested, I have the latest Chrome-it also has the Exact same problem!Read-write-services (talk)

Flagged Revs
Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template  « l | Ψrometheăn ™ | l »   (talk) 06:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for using the template  « l | Ψrometheăn ™ | l »   (talk) 08:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Chemetco page advice - thank you for answering so quickly
Thanks again (you helped me out just last night, too) for solving my query on a COI exit strategy. I have now taken your advice and put a call for good article status review on the relevant talk page. All the bestAstral Highway (talk) 10:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Rollbacker
You are now officially a rollbacker. Please use the extra buttons with care, or some bad things can happen (such as these rights being removed without notice or blocks). If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. &mdash; JamesR   ≈talk≈  06:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Misguided warning
Hi. Please do not add misguided warnings. POV disputes do not amount to vandalism. Secondly, I have sourced the information about Czech tourist industry. Do not blindly revert sourced material. Also refrain from personal attacks - telling someone that he is vandalising, while at most you are dealing with different POV (sourced at that), is certainly not appropriate! 78.30.163.113 (talk) 11:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Your edits are not appropriate. You have been warned by several editors. Your edits can be considered vandalism since they contain obviously inaccurate information. Your assertion regarding the sourcing is also suspect, Wikipedia requires reliable third-party sources for content in articles. Please refrain from adding this type of material to Wikipedia. Best regards. --Chasingsol(talk) 11:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Obviously wrong information?? You must be kidding. Try reading the references provided. Every word written is accurate. It is not just my experience. Isnt it true that Prague mayor posed incognito as a tourist and was ripped off in a taxi? Isnt it true that exchange boots use practice of 30% lower rates that written in front of their boots? Isnt it true that waiters are rude and try to add a 20% surcharge at restaurants, that tourists are warned of in sites I linked to? And since when adding such information is vandalism? Sorry, but you are deeply wrong about this. 78.30.163.113 (talk) 11:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

my recent edit
it is constuctive you turd mister and i want it to be kept because it is not vandalism and i hate hebrews and jews —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ch1ll Sh0ts (talk • contribs) 11:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Harry McNally
I fail to see what was unconstructive about my addition to the Harry McNally page. One of the clubs he scouted for was missing, I added it correctly and with citation.

Is Wikipedia really so pushed for space that it's necessary to delete one word and a reference? Seems unlikely to me 193.128.114.206 (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies. Sometimes I do make mistakes when reverting vandalism. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Best regards. --Chasingsol(talk) 14:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Out of interest, is it this shared IP that attracted your attention? I notice there are some previous warnings on it. 193.128.114.206 (talk) 14:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * We do tend to look closer at the edits made by IP's, since approximately 75% of vandalism originates from persons who do not have an account. I was indeed overzealous with the trigger. Over the course of the past few hours, I've reverted several hundred pieces of vandalism. Again, my apologies. --Chasingsol(talk) 14:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

London Town
Since when is correcting grammar not constructive????? 15:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.79.157.50 (talk)

Your version reads, "London Town is a 1946 musical film, was an infamous flop in the history of British cinema." That's hardly correct grammar. 67.79.157.50 (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

2010 Olympics
how is a better description of the image a bad idea? 76.66.198.171 (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My mistake. I was too fast with the trigger. My apologies. I reverted my change. --Chasingsol(talk) 15:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. Please remove your warning message from my talk page. Thanks. 76.66.198.171 (talk) 15:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Pinky and Perky
The article seems to have been ignored. Not updated since November 2008. --80.44.254.158 (talk) 17:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I understand, but you removed the vast majority of the content, which is why I reverted the change. --Chasingsol(talk) 17:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

CSD Tagging
Thanks for tagging Jimmy Chiu. Just a note, I deleted it under CSD A7. It was tagged under both G1 and G7, which don't apply in this case. G1 is for patent nonsense, G7 is where the user requests deletion. I'm not sure how either applied in this case. If I've missed something, please let me know. Many thanks,  Gazi moff  17:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Lightning Boots
Will i be able to make a page dedicated to my band? Who actually do reside in littlehampton?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.111.66.157 (talk) 18:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:BAND for the notability requirements. Your band must meet these requirements to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia. Useight (talk) 18:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

BarnStar

 * If you keep up the way you are going I am sure you will get more :)  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 19:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

François Rabelais
I'll watch this article for vandalism for you, since you're getting a little close to the revert rule today. WP:3RR Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 20:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Contesting Article 'Reds Hairdressing' Speedy Deletion
I intend to correct User:Redshair in the editing of the page Reds Hairdressing, and urge you to remove the speedy deletion tag, for I have myself gathered more information and research on this Singapore-based company, and will ensure a fairly-written article, and ensure that this page is not meant for promotional or commercial purposes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodysee (talk • contribs) 07:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Stop reverting sourced edits
You repeatedly reverted sourced information. Pay attention. (70.149.106.43 (talk) 08:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC))

vandalism
hi,I apologize if you found the edit to be vandalism but I feel it is constructive,and should be on wikipedia,

thanks 148.243.231.196 (talk) 10:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi there. Saying things like "Many Israelis harbour anti christian beliefs and even tourists are subject to hostility" in the Persecution of Christians article is hardly constructive. You should edit with a neutral point of view and provide reliable third-party sources. Also, copying and pasting content from other existing articles, such as Anti-Christian sentiment is not necessary since the content already exists elsewhere on Wikipedia. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards. --Chasingsol(talk) 11:08, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

editing billy crawford.
i have not done any editing on Billy Crawford's article. you might have mistaken me for another user. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.31.2 (talk) 13:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, it was definitely you. Wikipedia keeps track of every edit. See this link. --Chasingsol(talk) 13:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Aonori
Please elaborate why you see my edits acts of vandalism, or do not revert the article. What I did was just putting an additional description of the photo. Also, why and how are you reverting the article and leaving massages so quick? I suspect that you are, or are using, a bot. If so, what you do is acts of vandalising. --121.94.177.164 (talk) 03:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Butyl acetate
Butyl acetate is infact NOT an IUPAC name. Its IUPAC name is in fact Butyl ethanoate. I therefore suggest reverting your change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.147.89 (talk) 04:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you're incorrect. this source states that the IUPAC name is butyl acetate, and not Butyl ethanoate. Best regards. --Chasingsol(talk) 04:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Paganini links
How is posting a link to related material on Youtube vandalism? You are a complete idiot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.195.68 (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I need to contact someone
Recently someone messaged me about something I put in the "Sadness" article and that is when I didn't have an account. How do I find him here? I have is IP address but it requires a password or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boston1986 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but it was you under that account... Please do not vandalize Wikipedia. Best regards. --Chasingsol(talk) 04:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't think so
It could not have been me. How do you know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boston1986 (talk • contribs) 04:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Click on this link, it will show you every article you have edited under your account. --Chasingsol(talk) 05:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Consequences
What happens when you continue to vandalize pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistahtootle (talk • contribs) 05:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You get blocked from editing. You will still be able to view Wikipedia, but not edit it. --Chasingsol(talk) 05:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

greetings
good evening, i would like to play a game. lololololooloololol.

get a haircut, and get a real job.

peace out bro/sis/it

Yup, I'll never get to talk to him again.

hey
hey (aforementioned in subject/headline)

are you employed?

I'll never talk to him again
He somehow sent me a message when I did not have an account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boston1986 (talk • contribs) 05:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

yo
helloooo,

besides keeping a watchful eye on wikipedia articles, which there must be heaps of as you would definitely know, what else do you do?

what kind of training is needed to get to your superior position in this lifetime?

yoyoyo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madkunt99 (talk • contribs) 05:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I dont understand you, jerk
Stating what i am and why i feel im notable is not vandalism. It is realism. It is truth. It is what the world longs for. Are you saying that my life is not notable? ouch, jerk. congratulations, you have crushed my dreams.

-Mad Mike Creamer- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.182.76 (talk) 07:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

You are not a dictator
If you truly believe Bob Marley was not a peacemaker or peacekeeper, you Un-American, and you must hate people with fly dreads. It disgusts me how truly ignorant you are. You make me want to punch babies in the face, see Dane Cook. (Is that vandalism? Jerk.) Bob Marley wanted to cure the world by injecting love and music into it, and people like you are what gave him cancer, See "Chasingsol the Jerk." Yes, im clever. No you're not. The End...

Byaw, all in and/or around your mouth.

P.S. I'm not mean, but you offend me constantly. You are inconsiderate to the feelings of America's people.

-Someone Special- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.182.76 (talk) 07:16, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

sorry
sorry

105TH AS NASHVILLE
Kindly remove the reference to C-27's from the Aircraft Operated list. It perpetuates Nashville's unit as a laughing stock for the rest of the air guard and underlines the arrogance portrayed by its leadership. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.1.203.235 (talk) 02:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

how does adding a description of residents constitue vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.189.217 (talk) 02:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

EtOAc
The official IUPAC name is probably ethyl ethanoate, as indicated in the table. In case you're interested: Wikipedia-chemistry typically notes IUPAC names in the table but we dont push IUPAC nomenclature, especially when it is obscure, as in this case. Best wishes, --Smokefoot (talk) 03:22, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Why, Cajun
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Cajun accordion. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Chasingsol(talk) 03:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Why are you objecting to me adding cajun music schedules to cajun accordion? It is related and appropriate. It is not promotion. If you would look at it, it is a non-profit website strictly preserving cajun culture and cajun music which is directly related to the cajun accordion Cajunradio (talk) 03:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)cajunradio clarence@cajunradio.org

Chasingsol- YOU ARE THE VANDAL!
Please do not add misguided warnings. Some of my edits were just adding demographic facts, and neutral. How is this vandalism?

Also, POV disputes do not amount to vandalism. Do not blindly revert sourced material.

Also refrain from personal attacks - telling someone that he is vandalising, while at most you are dealing with different POV (sourced at that), is certainly not appropriate!

Who died and made you king? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.189.217 (talk) 03:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

dude, you suck why did you delete it? its not like it was hurting anything or anybody... it even said opinion on it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.4.222 (talk) 04:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

dude you suck, its not like it was hurting anything or anybody. it even said opinion on it.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.4.222 (talk) 04:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

no buddy Palestine is the actual state —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.18.52.30 (talk) 05:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Star Trek History Links
Please explain how the Star Trek History links are in any way "SPAM"? They are legitimate links to incredibly important deleted scenes from the original Star Trek history. Far from spam, they represent aspects of production for these episodes and extremely relevant material about the creation of these episodes. Did you happen to even LOOK at one of these links before you called it SPAM and removed it? Did you look at the YouTube video before you deleted it? Have you ever seen the deleted footage from Where No Man Has Gone Before and think it is SPAM or unimportant, despite being mentioned in the article? --76.233.87.107 (talk) 06:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Please review the Wikipedia policies regarding external links, as I also provided in my warnings. --Chasingsol(talk) 06:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I reviewed the policies and your "warnings" – that explains ONLY the YouTube link (which can be fixed later), but it does not explain the Star Trek History links, which have no commercial ads, or links to commercial sites. It is pure historical research found nowhere else on the net and would be of interest to a large majority of those who visit the article. Where exactly does the SPAM lie there? On what are you basing your various threats?--76.233.87.107 (talk) 06:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You may also want to review External links. Wikipedia is not a collection of links. I understand all the rules may be confusing, but the wholesale addition of the same link to numerous articles is highly discouraged and considered disruptive. I requested that you stop, which would have allowed discussion, but you ignored the warnings and continued. --Chasingsol(talk) 06:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I understand Wiki is not a collection of links. I see nothing there that prohibits what I did. Further, I had made ALL of my edits before you ever found the first one. I ignored nothing. You warned me over something you were coming across at a later time, or your software was notifying you of well after the fact. I watched a whole movie after I made those edits and came back to find your remarks. It is very uncool of you to block me as punishment for something I did not do, when at this point in time it was only to prevent further conversation – extremely petty. Further, each and every one of those links I added are NOT the same LINK, Most of them were different pages of the same site with specific references to the episode to which it was posted. It is YOU who did a wholesale revert without checking the content of those links. Simply because I labeled them all the same: "deleted scenes" does NOT mean that they were all the same link, it just means for that article they constitute the deleted scenes. No need to block me again as I have no intention of doing anything about this tonight, or anytime soon for that matter. But you need to realize that I have broken no Wiki policies and in each case only enhanced what someone could learn from the article with a well placed external link.--76.233.87.107 (talk) 07:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I did not block you, you were blocked by an administrator. You can find the block reason provided at your previous IP addresses talk page here: User talk:76.233.87.107. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies, a good place to start is Welcome. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Best regards. --Chasingsol<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk) 07:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clearing that up. However his explanation was the same as yours, "I continued to add spam links". Obviously since you issued the warning you must have reported me. Either way, all of the links were added in a matter of 10 minutes, long before I ever got your first notice and long before I was blocked. So forget it. Clearly a misunderstanding. I would appreciate it if you would, however, after reviewing my explanation above, please explain why the StarTrekHistory links I added are still considered in violation of some Wiki policies, which I have thoroughly reviewed.--75.56.213.1 (talk) 07:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The main ideal behind Wikipedia is to include information that is verifiable by reliable third-party sources. I am not at all questioning the admirable work that has been performed on the site. The issue is that it's mass inclusion in numerous articles without discussion and without it being a notable website, is considered disruptive. The website itself has never received any news coverage from a reliable third-party source. Websites of this type are often considered fancruft. I understand your assertion that it is non-commercial, although every single image on the site also references an indisputably commercial website. I'm sure you can appreciate the number of people who strongly believe that THEIR website is important for inclusion, no matter what Wikipedia policies are. Two of Wikipedia's core policies are maintaining a neutral point of view and avoiding conflicts of interest. All of the above are my reasons for asserting that the inclusion is considered spam. My best recommendation is that you contact the WikiProject Star Trek to discuss with them whether there is any material worthy of inclusion. I am certain you will find interest in the material that is available, and perhaps you would also consider releasing some under a Wikipedia compatible license, which would allow it's inclusion in articles. I hope this helps, let me know if you have any further questions. Best regards. --Chasingsol<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk) 08:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Ferrari F60
This is the reason why I changed the page from a redirect to a stand-alone:

http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_news_item.php?fes_art_id=36816

And I have no time to create a complete page, so I'll leave it to someone else to do the honours.
 * Yup, my bad. I've reverted my changes. --Chasingsol<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk) 09:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Added a link
The link I've added was important as it offers to the viewers the possibility to access to a MERP zine.

I don't see why you erase this. This is a violation of contribution.


 * You should probably read about Wikipedia policies regarding external links. Wikipedia is not a collection of links to non-notable websites. --Chasingsol<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk) 12:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

But this is a notable website, as it features a MERP zine. OK this is linked with www.merp.com. This grants the user another site to go in.

Question
Hi,

I recently created an article Brodie_neill, but want the URL to read Brodie_Neill (with caps for both first name and surname). Any way I can change this, or is the only option to delete and start again?
 * Create it! That's all you have to do and nominate the old one for deletion. --Chasingsol<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk) 12:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: My comments on the Pages St Mary's College & Merchant Taylors
They weren't actually me.

I didn't realise the school computers automatically saved my login details, and another pupil(Andrew Edgeller) Actually edited those pages...

Thanks, Jan

2009 Costa Rica Earthquake
Hi -

I see you were the person who corrected this last. I just added a donations section, but am not sure how to edit the References page to reference my source, which is -

http://www.nacion.com/ln_ee/ESPECIALES/2009/enero/sismo/

If you could let me know or if you don't mind doing it, I would really appreciate it! Just want people to know that they are all valid donation venues.

Thanks!

Nora 201.202.177.210 (talk) 13:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Polanski
For what it's worth, I think you did the right thing. Perhaps Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard might be needed at some point. Rossrs (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate it. After looking more at the talk page, I think you're right. It may not be a bad idea to take it there anyway, I don't see much constructive discussion occurring about this particular sensitive subject, and it looks more like personal opinions coming to the fore than any attempts to maintain NPOV. --Chasingsol<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk) 14:44, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I see you've listed it. It will be interesting to see what results from it. Rossrs (talk) 15:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I also agree with your edit to the talk page. This has been an ongoing issue at Polanski for a while.  We have been to BLP board already and, based on the editor's behaviour (now and potentially previously under an IP), will be again.  I am going to warn the editor for making a false warning, and explain why the redaction on the talk page was quite appropriate.sinneed (talk) 18:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Page blanked by author
Hi. Though page blanking is usually vandalism and needs to be reverted, it is worth looking first at the page history, because quite often the author has blanked his own page, as was the case with Gary Witheford just now. In those cases the best thing is to tag it. It can be confusing for an author who realises his page is inappropriate and blanks it, if his page is at once restored and he is accused of vandalism for the blanking and told it was unconstructive. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you John, I was obviously overzealous in this case. I appreciate the heads up. --Chasingsol<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk) 15:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Just a comment from my unhappy experience. You probably already knew this one... but I did not know that wp:blanking allows all users to blank their talk pages.  I had known logged in users could, but I painstakingly restored a lot of warnings to a shared IP talk page... then learned it was ok for any one of the users to blank the page at any time.  *sigh*sinneed (talk) 18:40, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Zoro edit
I cleaned it a little up ...

"death metal"
though the death is normally spealt "death" in the metal genre, its spelled "deth", i made an edit and you flagged it as vandalism, deth is the propper spelling for the genre as i said before

Your response shows that you didn't take the time to actually read what I added, and let it sink in and expand your reference frame. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ExpandYourMind (talk • contribs) 04:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Uploading image
Hi Chasingsol, thanks for replying. I went to the link, filled out all the required data, clicked "Upload," and nothing happened. Can you help me further or upload the image yourself? Thank you very much in advance. Softlavender (talk) 05:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, I have no clue how to save an image to my computer. If you like, I can give you the fair use info, at least what I wrote down:

I don't know whether to put the prospective article, Cosmopolitan (film), as the target article, or User:Softlavender/Cosmopolitan (film). I got a message that the former article "doesn't seem to exist," so I decided to list the article as it appears now. But will the image still survive the changeover to Wikipedia proper? Or, are you supposed to wait until you've finished and posted the article before adding images? Softlavender (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks so much! That looks great! Softlavender (talk) 06:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Cosmopolitanpostersmall.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cosmopolitanpostersmall.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

AIV
Hey - thanks for your hard work!! I noticed it was backlogged so I thought I'd better have a tidy up! Pedro : Chat  09:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

hi
Hi I am impressed by your gesture of cleaning up vandalism.But my previous edit was more intentionally directed at mathew hayden, one of the most arrogant creature walking on this earth.

But the way you have taken care of the article had far reaching impacting on me.I would like to contribute as well, to clean up the wonderful wiki of vandal pages. Please let me know how i can contribute and make Wiki a better place.

220.227.75.126

I have four questions

Q1: Can I change my printing and my background to a diferent color other than black and white? Q2: Can I make a link from here to my youtube channel and my blog? Q3: Is there a way I can change my Username from PandmeicLight to PandemicLight Productions? Q4: Can I add pictures? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PandemicLight (talk • contribs) 12:21, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Lesion
You reported me for vandalism for my work on the Lesion page despite the fact that you reverted it to a nonsensical page with repeating sections. Please revert your edit as this is the second time that a recent edit quickdraw has made the page unreadable. Thanks. Szafraki (talk) 01:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

hi
thanks for the message so I went to my preferences and I don't know what to click on. I want to change my printing from black to blue and my background from white to black. the other thing I had trouble with was adding an external link, I need to have a link from here to my youtube account. Can I only make links to other wikipedia users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PandemicLight (talk • contribs) 13:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Your recent help with IE/Chrome display issues.
Hi Chasingsol, Just to let you know one of your last suggestions seems to be the actual problem, yesterday I brought it to the attention of our IT guys, they said it is an issue with our anti-virus software, one they had not seen, however, they will fix it within the next week or so. thank you for your help-it is appreciated. Read-write-services (talk) 22:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Nonsensical "vandalism revert"
I made this edit (logged out). You then reverted it with a templated message one minute later. I'd like you to detail your claim that the information in question is incorrect - if you have reliable sources to this effect, the Oxford Capacity Analysis article could do with your additions. I suspect it'd take something pretty overwhelming, though. And if you don't have Reliable Sources to this effect, you have no business doing "vandalism reversions" in the style you do and really need to consider your work more carefully - WP:BITE is in fact policy, and is policy for good reason - David Gerard (talk) 23:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case concerning Korlzor
You have been helping fight vandalism inflicted by various IP sockpuppets of the blocked User:Korlzor. You may be interested in a sockpuppetry case I have opened here. Best regards. Tennis expert (talk) 10:35, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

My edit to Domino's Pizza UK & IRL
I recently made an edit (not with this account - I'd forgotten to log in) to the "Labour issues" section of the above article adding that some workers were not merely being paid nothing but being made to pay the company; you reverted it. But that fact is mentioned in both of the two BBC News articles cited as sources for the paragraph - specifically in the seventh and penultimate paragraphs of "Domino's staff claim exploitation" and the seventh paragraph of "Domino's workers in 'slavery' row" - so I've restored a slightly better worded version of what I added before. Ou tis (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

OK question
How do I become an administrator? Do you have to be 18 or older? Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 03:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again! Typically, it takes a lot of work with Wikipedia in all parts of the website. There is no specific age requirement, there are admins who are under 18. You can find more information at WP:ADMIN. Let me know if you have any more questions. Best regards. Chasingsol<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk) 04:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for watching my back. <font face="Bauhaus 93" color="blue" size="4">Geoff TC 04:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Screw you middle class
you are a lifeless asshole and should take a long walk of the shortest pier you can find — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.4.222 (talk)

Wikimedia-Mobile Bug Report
First of all, thanks for the report. We need this kind of thing! But, alas, its the only bug in our database. I'll post back when its taken care of!

[]

Hampton (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cosmopolitanpostersmall.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Cosmopolitanpostersmall.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Cosmopolitan
OK, thanks for putting up the article from my userpage so the image wouldn't be lost. Next time around, I'll know not to request adding an image before the article is put onto Wikipedia proper! :) Anyway, I'll flesh out the article eventually. Thanks again ~ Softlavender (talk) 06:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for voting in my successfully closed RfA! I'm glad that you trust me. Ping me if you need anything! Best regards, -- Kanonkas : <font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;"> Talk 19:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the excellent suggestions this evening; very helpful. One additional question: in order to create an article in user space - or subpage of User:Tonymartin - do I simply edit and save the article temporarily on my user page?

Once I take that step, I will then contact the administrator, User:SchuminWeb.Tonymartin (talk) 04:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

hey!
I just recently edited a page and everything i put on that page was true. It came from my knowledge, not from a site. Why is it considered vandalism, because i really didnt put anything not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laladem (talk • contribs) 14:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC) i hate you go die in a hole okay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justjessilyn (talk • contribs) 16:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Non-Free Image
It's not vandalism, becuase I was the only contributer anyway. The problem with Disney portals is that all of his material is copyrighted, and its hard to find a free image. I blanked it becuase "Rafaki.jpg" or whatever is a nonfree image (oops), so it i thought it better to simply blank it-the latter part of a file's tag is not a very pretty thing on a portal.

Resident Mario (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Murder in Paradise (The Hardy Boys)
Your PROD and my PROD2 got taken off by an IP; I have taken it to AfD here. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Links
Dear Chasingsol,

you nearly barred me at: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.73.133.214&redirect=no for adding links that apparently are not relevant. I do not understand what basis you made this accusation on. The link I provided, www.archi-pedia.com has a rich gallery of untextured 3D objects. Granted the site warrants visitors to create a username and password, this is simply to protect the site content from spiders, etc. What will it take for the link to be kept up without being blocked? Why is it considered vandalism? I noticed that you left a link from the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architectural_rendering to: http://www.archstudio.co.in/

What makes this a legitimate link compared with mine? I don't get it. Please explain so that I will not make the same mistake again. I would hate to be barred!!!

I look forward to your kind reply.

Regards,

Ori —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.73.133.214 (talk) 21:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey dude. About KXXR.
Can you leave my edit next time you receive a message about it. Would really appreciate it. It allows me an outlet after getting fired there. You would help me mentally if you did that for me.

Andy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.33.187 (talk) 09:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Nankali-post System
Thank you for your comment. My problem is that once the article was deleted,and another person helped me to return it. The reason for delition was the references. I wondered if you could tel me that am I in rieght way? I really appreciate your comments!--Ali nankali (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Hi Chasing - I have a feeling you're overpatrolling. We've just come out of extensive vetting of the eOffice article - what seems to be the problem? JustMA (talk) 10:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

EOffice
I removed the speedy because it's claim to be award winning indicates notability. I'm not even sure about the advert tag, in its original incarnation it certainly was, after much culling of peacock terms and getting JustMA, the author to provide references I don't think its written like an advert any more. COI on the other hand, well that concern still stands somewhat. --Blowdart | talk 10:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

So how did you catch my change so fast?
Did some kind of tool automatically alert you that a change had been made, or did you anally check the page every 20 minutes word by word? I've never understood how wikipedia isn't full of spam, so I tried making a relatively harmless change to a well trafficked page to see how long it took to get caught.

99.140.165.8 (talk) 09:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Interesting
One serious fault I have found with wikipedia is this : URL references to web pages for supporting an article tend to die. That is, many wiki articles have dead links for supporting assertions made on the page. Has anyone ever considered incorporating a caching mechanism, where wikipedia would save webpages that in turn support a wikipedia article? 99.140.165.8 (talk) 09:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

angelstoday.net
Dear Chasingsol,

I've left just one more reference from "Angels" article, please do not delete it as it doesn't brake any Wikipedia rule.

Best regards, Michael. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misha2001m (talk • contribs) 07:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

rushmoor school page
nothing that i am writing is untrue i am struggling to see where the vandalism is coming from?? regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.177.53 (talk) 21:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Question
I added a post with information that I invested a great deal of time and effort to create. It was not added as an advertisement, etc. Although this information is posted on my personal website, it is no different from other information pages that are featured in this section as wellNYmohel (talk) 21:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Please assume good faith. In my opinion a single example of the use of variables  and   in Java suffices to illustrate the concept. Of course we can add similar code in BASIC, Simula, Modula, C, C++, C#, Haskell, and so on, but what is the added value? In my edit summary I did clearly indicate the rationale for my edit, so why assume this is vandalism? 88.233.38.17 (talk) 22:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, no problem. 88.233.38.17 (talk) 22:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

tyDi
Hello!

Do you think the page now is fine?

Pls let me know...

Best regards,

-AndrewFiam —Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewFiam (talk • contribs) 22:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Ken Pauls Milano
Thanks for your reply on my talk page and your assistance with article Ken Pauls Milano. I have removed the redirect from the user page as it should not be redirecting to article name space. Dbiel (Talk) 11:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Extension names
Thanks Chasingsol, so images referring to maps can be in .jpg, .png and .svg but which of the three extension names is required or prescribed by Wikipedia? Kampfgruppe (talk) 04:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, thank you User:Chasingsol. I understand now. Kampfgruppe (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user talk page.. much appreciated. Also kudos on your anti-vandalism work.. beat me to more than a few reverts/warnings tonight! :) -BloodDoll (talk) 03:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Meagan Good
Please note that her character in You Got Served is named "Beautifull", not "Beautiful". Ward3001 (talk) 03:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you.
Hey there. I would like to thank you, Chasingsol, for supporting me in my RfA, which, sadly, was closed at 14/25/6.  Until It Sleeps PublicPC    19:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Thank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again!--Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 00:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Branstar thanks
I have always wanted to figure out why I seem to get into cycles of being just ahead or just behind other vandalism fighters. Sometimes I'll be baffled at how so-and-so keeps on reverting a microsecond ahead of me. While it offends me that we allow vandals such easy access to Wikipedia, I am glad that we have the tools to fight it. I appreciate your recognition and look forward to the day when all of this time spent fighting vandals will no longer be needed. Alansohn (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Rihanna
Over Rihanna's article, there was no consensus yet. --Efe (talk) 08:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I suggest you discuss it at the article talk page. I am not the only user involved in this. There are too many... including IPs. --Efe (talk) 08:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Thanks for the concern. Perhaps when it is there, further corrections will be made to agree with the guidelines especially BLP. No worries. --Efe (talk) 04:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * There are numerous BLP concerns with regards to Rihanna's privacy. I've restated on the talk page that information regarding the assault should be removed until the investigation is over. The Bookkeeper   (of the Occult)  08:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Just to be clear, I have no grudge (and not to assume you felt I had one) against you personally, nor the phrasing/wording of your edits which I agree is a neutral as the subject can be. Nonetheless, I still feel (personally) the information is inappropriate until the investigation is closed. The Bookkeeper  (of the Occult)  10:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Can this link be a good reference?

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A01E6DD1138F930A1575BC0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

I'm new at this Thanks Mvsqz77 (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Pictures
I have some picture, but don't know how to upload them. I'm not sure if i have rights?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvsqz77 (talk • contribs) 06:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

gfy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.138.38.37 (talk) 05:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Greetings from EllieDee
Is it possible to send a private message? I just wanted to thank you for all your help... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elliedee (talk • contribs) 21:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course. You can click here: Special:EmailUser/Chasingsol. Best regards. --Chasingsol<sup style="color:darkblue">(talk) 21:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

RFA
Dear Chasingsol, slightly belated post holiday thanks for your support in my RFA which was successful, I really appreciate the time you spent in discussing and reviewing your position in that RFA, your questions were a great example of what RFA should be and showed you'd clearly tailored them to your target. The full Oscar acceptance speech version of my Thankspam is here, its best viewed by reading out loud in the style of Ms Winslett :-)  Were <font color="FFA500">Spiel <font color="FFC0CB">Chequers  00:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Turtle Bay Association
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Turtle Bay Association, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * References do not help to establish this association's notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 23:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Just wanted to say Hi
Hey.

I haven't seen you in a while, and I just wanted to say hi, and that I hope everything is going good for you. l8r. J.delanoy <sup style="color:red;">gabs <sub style="color:blue;">adds 15:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of page
I've just now noticed that a page I created was deleted in January, so apologies for my late reply.

A friend of mine who has myriad and serious health problems mentioned that she has been helped by a medicine named Canova. I noticed that there was little information about this medicine on the Internet. I thought it would be helpful to assemble what little information there is in one place, it might well help other people. I have not used Canova myself, I have no reason to believe it would help my own particular health problems. I have no connection of any kind to any people or organizations that produce or sell that product, except that I am aquainted with my aforementioned friend who finds it useful.

I grant that the people who manufacture Canova might benefit from the existence of a Wikipedia article about their product. On the other hand, if we eliminate all Wikipedia articles about all initial-stage medicinal treatments in early development, it would seem to me that Wikipedia overall would not be as broadly useful as it ought to be.

Virtually any treatment in its initial, nascent stage of development is usually produced by a single patent holder in the first few years. If a patented cure for cancer were launched and sold starting today, and generic versions were not available for the first few years, would it be appropriate for Wikipedia to ban all articles about such an initially unique medicine? As near as I can tell, that is the situation that Canova is in just now, there is no broader category of medicines that Wikipedia can write about for the moment, Canova is temporarily unique. Is it really in everyone's best interest that nothing be written about this treatment in Wikipedia?

Has Wikipedia policy evolved to the point where it addresses these cases? I appreciate a policy that says that we can write articles about aspirin, we just can't write articles about Bayer aspirin. But suppose in some imaginary universe where aspirin was invented *after* the Internet was created, and during the first decade of the existance of aspirin the only aspirin *was* Bayer aspirin, there were no alternative brands yet. Should Wikipedia then ban articles about the new miracle drug aspirin because initially there was only one brand available?

Please re-read the deleted article and consider some way around this. I can't think of any way to write about the kind of drug Canova is, because to the best of my knowledge, it is its only kind.

Please prove me wrong. I don't want sick people to be deprived of information because of the perceived needs of an informational bureaucracy.

- Roger Burns, userid cfs-news Cfs-news (talk) 03:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)