User talk:Chatterbox1880

August 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Harold Lloyd, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. '' Please don't remove the references. If you think, the content of the article should be changed greatly, post your proposal on the talk page. Hear what others have to say about it.'' AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 08:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Harold Lloyd Estate, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Please refrain. Talk to the editors on the corresponding pages.'' AbhiMukh97 (Speak) (Contribs) 08:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Removal of sourced content
You have repeatedly removed sourced content from the Harold Lloyd and Harold Lloyd Estate articles concerning Lloyd's support for an attempt to enforce an all-white covenant in court. The assertion is supported by an excerpt from the 2001 book "As Long as They Don't Move Next Door" which states at page 76: "one of the white homeowners who led the challenge to black occupancy in Beverly Hills was silent-screen comedian, Harold Lloyd." In your edit comments, you claim that the information is "unfounded information that actually has been proven to be false. LEGAL ACTION FROM THE LLOYD FAMILY TO FOLLOW." As the content is supported by reliable source material, you will need to provide reliable source material to support your contrary contention. Please also familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policy concerning legal threats as set forth in No legal threats. Cbl62 (talk) 23:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * In addition to the threats of legal action in your edit summaries, you also made the following claim at User talk:AbhiMukh97: "In reality, Mr. Lloyd had nothing to do with any of this. LEGAL ACTION FROM THE LLOYD FAMILY TO FOLLOW, as this is slander." Given the reliable sourcing stating that Lloyd "led the challenge", you will need to substantiate your claim to the contrary. Also, what is your legal basis for claiming that the law of "slander" applies to a person who died in 1971? The assertion appears to be contrary to California law providing that "under current California law, a deceased person’s reputation cannot be injured, and thus no legal cause of action exists for 'defamation of the dead.'" See here. Cbl62 (talk) 23:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 23:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have independent, reliable source that make counterclaims, it would be good to include them. However, by blanking the entire section we can't even be sure of which statements you take issue with.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 00:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)