User talk:Chattha4212

March 2011
Your addition to Portal:Chemistry/ChemCOTM has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. A copy of the text you posted exists at http://www.keenzo.com/showproduct.asp?ID=2066114 where it is marked Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd John of Reading (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Chichawatni. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  05:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chichawatni. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  05:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Your addition to Chichawatni has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  05:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shazia Hidayat


A tag has been placed on Shazia Hidayat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 05:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chichawatni, you may be blocked from editing. Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  00:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Chichawatni Tehsil, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  02:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Final warning
I know that I have already left one final warning, but I am currently using my phone and am unable to report it. So, consider this another final warning. Your edits are highly inappropriate. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a place to brag about how great a teacher is. Please read WP:5P to learn the basic of editing here. Your edits violate WP:NPOV, WP:COPYVIO, as well as several others. If you continue to post it, you will find yourself blocked. Apparition11 Complaints / Mistakes  15:47, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 02:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

UTRS Account Request
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Chattha4212 (talk) '''Account block is just to upload my city where I live Most of incorrect information s were present I just add some information which are false such Chak 42 /12-L 5 Km away. but its only 2.5 Km. similarly education institution that were written that perhaps exit but main govt. Degree college was not mention.

I conclude from blockage its just to provide information of administrator may be true or false. I have also found that edit word should be ended no information can added. I am very much disappointing to all the situation.if its community information them may be true. I appeal to unblock the account.If still I am wrong violate the rules & upload non- verifiable material(according to you). Then I don't want to waste time at Wikipedia, wikia all other. Thank a lot to to provide me my opinion.'''