User talk:Chaturaji

Administrators abusing their power

 * The only "agenda" I have is preventing further disruption to the encyclopedia caused by your repeated failure to follow WP:BRD and achieve consensus before reintroducing your edits. Your disruptive behavior started with your edit warring at Chess, and you've continued this behavior at Chaturanga despite being reverted numerous times. While you finally made an attempt to discuss the matter at the talk page of the former article, you continued to disrupt the latter article, often with tendentious edit summaries. Furthermore, I have not introduced any new information to either article, reverting only to previous stable versions per WP:EW and WP:STABLE, so your assertion that I am falsifying anything is blatantly false. I stand by my block. -- Kinu t/c 23:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * You fail to understand that I also did not add any new information to ‘Chaturanga’ which is already not mentioned under ‘Chess’ or other related Wikipedia articles. You’re argument is therefore flawed. Chaturaji (talk) 23:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You were the one who introduced this wording into the lead of Chess without any source to back it up, and you were the one who introduced similar wording at History of chess, so your argument is circular. Thanks for pointing that out so both of those leads can be restored to their previous stable versions prior to your disruption. -- Kinu t/c 23:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Why on earth would you remove my edits which were researched by a great scholar such as h j Murray??
 * Given this edit, I think I'm done responding unless you have something substantive to say. -- Kinu t/c 06:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

I always believe truth prevails anyway and someone will take note of your agenda and actions. Chaturaji (talk) 11:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)