User talk:Chatwath

May 2020
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Nigella sativa. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 01:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Nigella sativa. ''... and WP:SPAM. '' Zefr (talk) 23:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)


 * These are credible sources links necessary for the page and right information, not associated with it, discouraging and dismantling people what kind of open source resource is it. Go take a test! Chatwath (talk) 23:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Healthline and the Times of India are not credible sources for health or disease content on Wikipedia. Read WP:MEDRS and WP:WHYMEDRS. Anytime you see in the title of an article the words "incredible" or "astounding", you should ignore the source. The Drugs.com source here says "More human studies are needed before kalanji can be recommended for any indication," and states elsewhere that "there are no clinical data." There are no scientifically or clinically approved uses for N. sativa anywhere in the world. Zefr (talk) 00:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You are somewhat correct but atleast there should be some input regarding alternative medicine and the research they have done, it can't be infatuated and is something credible. Chatwath (talk) 12:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No, alternative medicine is quackery and based on absent or poor, unreliable experiences and research. At Wikipedia, we are biased toward verifiable science and modern medicine. Zefr (talk) 13:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)