User talk:Chaudeau

Proposed deletion of Technologist (magazine)


The article Technologist (magazine) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * New magazine, too young to have become notable yet. Article creation vastly premature.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 14:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that both the magazine and the university network deserve to be mentioned in Wikipedia. I already added a reference and will add some more soon. Let me know if you have any suggestion to improve the article. Chaudeau (talk) 19:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC).

Nomination of Technologist (magazine) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Technologist (magazine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Technologist (magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 22:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Deletion notifications
Hi, It is standard practice to notify the article creator if one proposes an article for deletion. These notifications do not belong on the article's talk page, because they must be displayed on the article itself. If you look at those PROD banners (not the AfD one), you will see that they instruct the person who is proposing deletion to notify the article creator. BTW, I apologize for the second PROD. An article can only be prodded once. I just clicked the wrong button when I did that, I intended AfD. It's been corrected since.I'll also remove the extra and superfluous notice on your talk page. hope this explains. --Randykitty (talk) 11:22, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

_ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.193.109.126 (talk) 01:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Geneva International Peace Research Institute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geneva International Peace Research Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Geneva International Peace Research Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 10:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)