User talk:Chaudhary Anish kasana

July 2021
Hello, Chaudhary Anish kasana,

The edit you made, at Nagabhata I, was unconstructive and has been reverted. You removed a detailed, well-worded, and sourced paragraph and replaced it with a couple of statements which were unencyclopedic in tone and unsupported by any references.

Here's a hint: if you see something on Wikipedia which seems wrong, have a look at the article page history. In this case, someone else had changed "it is not certain" to "it is certain".

I understand that the views of Sharma 2012 may be controversial, but the way to balance those is to summarise reliable rebuttals. Asserting "this is our history, it is true" won't cut it.

Regards, Pelagic (talk) 01:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)