User talk:Chays77

March 2016
Hello, I'm TJRC. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Law practice management. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Owen Pataki
Hello, Chays77,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Owen Pataki should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Owen Pataki.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Domdeparis (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

paid editing
Hi from what i can gather from the links that i have just removed from your user page which were contrary to WP:UP and your editing history you are a paid editor for a certain number of people. If this is the case your paid editing must be disclosed on your user page or on each article as per WP:PAID. --Domdeparis (talk) 09:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

I work in digital marketing but I do not charge my clients for updating wikipedia if it requires an update. So how would you suggest I update my user page?


 * Hi if you are working on your clients' pages even if you do not specifically charge them for updating then as far as I gather you are considered as a paid editor as I imagine that this is a service that you include in your contractual relationship with you clients (either verbal or written). I also very much doubt that you will be posting potentially negative information about your clients. This relationship is not forbidden but must be declared on your user page and any direct editing is very strongly discouraged. Updating existing pages with neutral verifiable information of an encyclopedic value from a reliable source is less potentially problematic than page creations. All page creations should be submitted for peer review as a draft and modifications should be discussed on the talk page first or you may well find your edits are reverted if members of the community feel that they are not neutral.


 * You must disclose the names of your clients as per WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE if you wish to edit their pages and your user page should be updated. Please do not add links to you own web pages and professional profils as this is clearly advertising and strictly forbidden and will result in an indefinite ban in all likelihood. Domdeparis (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yello Software


A tag has been placed on Yello Software, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Chays77, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Adam Grant have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)