User talk:ChazBeckett/Archives/2007/June

Virtual COnsole (North America)
I won't revert your edit yet, but it's obvious on the talk page that there is a clear consensus that the points SHOULD be included. TJ Spyke 22:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * That's simply not true. While consensus doesn't mean "everyone agrees", it certainly doesn't mean "evenly divided". In any case, information on Wii Points is included in the article, in the introduction. Chaz Beckett 22:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:NOT addition
Thanks for this and thanks for crediting me! :-) Carcharoth 11:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Round in Circles.
Chaz, I just wanted to say I think it might be helpful if we keep the "Round in Circles" template on the talk page; I don't disagree with Brandon having added it, since users on both sides of the debate have stated their arguments for deleting or keeping the points several times, and the template should encourage readers to look at what's already there before commenting.

Just wanted to throw that by you so I don't seem uncivil if I add it back in. --PeanutCheeseBar 13:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment
What_Wikipedia_is_not: #4 is about prices. This was added a few days ago, and I was told about it on my talk page earlier. So frankly: as no one has objected to this addition, points don't need to be listed on the VC list at all. The compromise doesn't need to happen, as it violates #4 clearly. What do you think? RobJ1981 15:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC)