User talk:Chazbob01

June 2014
Hello, I'm DJAMP4444. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Newton Burgoland, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DJAMP 4444  (talk)  17:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charlie Kilfeather


A tag has been placed on Charlie Kilfeather requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 17:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rik Mayall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rik Mayall was changed by Chazbob01 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96529 on 2014-06-19T17:43:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ibstock Community College, you may be blocked from editing. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 17:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ibstock Community College, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ibstock Community College was changed by Chazbob01 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2014-06-19T17:51:05+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)