User talk:ChazzyG

Speedy deletion nomination of Meningsløs


A tag has been placed on Meningsløs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Hairhorn (talk) 03:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Response to your email
Thanks for contacting me - however, in future should you wish to contact me, it's usually easier via my talk page!

The reason why I deleted the Meningsløs article was because there was no claim of significance or importance.

You are a rapper from a hip hop group who has no article on Wikipedia (with no indication of any chart success given), who writes for a cultural magazine with no article on Wikipedia (with no indication of any notable national/international awards for your writing), who founded a hip-hop collective who has no article on Wikipedia.

Before deleting, I looked for some reliable and independent sources about Sx3, but could find none (only those about a sports arena of that name); the same goes for the magazine Frekvens and the collective XN-TriQ.

I also looked for some independent, reliable sources for you (as Daniel Charles Hextall, Daniel Charles Hextall-Schjelderup, ChazzyG and Meningsløs aktivering) but failed to find any.

So the article failed to present any reasons why you are significant or important, and a search didn't find anything which would indicate otherwise.

To qualify for an article on Wikipedia, you need to meet the general notability guidelines (as well as the criteria for musicians).

You also need to be aware of our conflict of interest guidelines - we don't generally suggest that people write articles about themselves for a few reason. Firstly, it is hard for a person to write about themselves in a subjective, neutral point of view. Secondly, they tend to see it as a way of promoting themselves, which is not allowed. Finally, if the article about them is deleted (or edited in an unflattering way, but where it is properly referenced), then they don't tend to be happy!

Regards,  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, I have just deleted your user page for the same reason - a user page is not a place for a deleted article, or for self-promotion  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)