User talk:Chdbhangoo

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! --  Tinu  Cherian  - 05:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of Rattan Singh Bhangu
A tag has been placed on Rattan Singh Bhangu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. --  Tinu  Cherian  - 05:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Insertions in Referenced content
Please do not insert words in referenced content as you have done in this article viz Jat people in Islamic history Intothefire (talk) 08:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Rattansinghbhangu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rattansinghbhangu.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 20:53, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Moron Fort.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Moron Fort.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Moron Fort.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Moron Fort.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 21:46, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Elliot & Dowson at Bhangu
Hi, you have recently cited Elliot & Dowson at Bhangu but you do not say what page of what edition it is that you are citing. This is always important but in the case of this particular source is extremely so. You'll be aware that the source is mostly translations of ancient texts and as such most of it is primary source material. On the other hand, there are some bits of commentary inserted into it by Elliot and Dowson.

Please can you provide full details for the three citations that you added in order that the statements can be verified. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I see that you have done the same thing since my above message in your contributions here. It may be worth you spending a little time reading WP:CITE for some guidance. It would be a shame if your efforts have to be removed because either they are primary sources or are unverifiable. - Sitush (talk) 18:34, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * ... and now you have done it again! Why? I am minded to remove your contributions because I am struggling to verify the things. - Sitush (talk) 22:21, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * OK, I've now searched Massy, and Elliot & Dowson. I have not yet located Bhangoo. I can find nothing in those cited sources that supports the statements for which you have used them. Give me some help, please. - Sitush (talk) 22:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The information is visible in snippet form on gbooks, but not in PRACHIN PANTH PRAKASH, rather in Sri Gur Panth Prakash. It is in the preface, p xi, with the usual disclaimer about snippet views.  In any case, worldcat doesn't admit to the existence of a translated version of Prachin, only Sri, the translated version of Sri is dated the date given for the translated version of Prachin, and I haven't been able to find the difference between the two.  Perhaps this should be taken to the article talk page?  The source may also be useful for the articles on Rattan Singh Bhangu and Mehtab Singh Bhangu. JanetteDoe (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, I found it late on the 18th. It has problems as a self-published source, and is very old. Nonetheless, in the circumstances I will try to raise this issue on the article talk page. There was no point in doing so initially, and indeed the failure to respond even when there has been an orange bar flashing suggests to me that there will remain no point. I've not been entirely "with it" these last few days due to a cold - sorry if I have over-reacted. - Sitush (talk) 08:28, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I see that you have done some work regarding those sources. As I have said previously, I remain unhappy with them. They are old, unreliable and in some cases appear to be self-published. If that is the best that we can do then I am tempted to delete both the statements and the sources. - Sitush (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)