User talk:Cheaposgrungy

John Sellers (nerd)
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. (aeropagitica) 22:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Pornography
Hi, I reverted your edit to Talk:Pornography because it changes the meaning of the thread which follows the header. Ordinarily, changing the section titles on talk pages is discouraged unless there is a good reason for it. In this case, the debate was over whether stag films are pornographic because they lack sexual allure. So I restored the heading to the more descriptive original one. Silly rabbit (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:New-wiiware-game-defend-your-castle-20080229102032050.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:New-wiiware-game-defend-your-castle-20080229102032050.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 18:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Calorific value yogurt
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Calorific value yogurt, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Accounting4Taste: talk 00:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Caffien
I thank you for sourcing the alt spelling, but there's no need to attack me in your edit summary. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Vitamin A2 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vitamin A2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vitamin A2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 19:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)