User talk:Cheaposgrungy1

Welcome!
Hello, Cheaposgrungy1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alexbrn (talk) 07:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Paleolithic diet. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 16:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * I agree, stop reverting my edits. Most others (historically) also have disagreed with your approach in how it maintains Wikipedia's neutrality. A user on the Talk page has already established multiple valid points as well.
 * If you have an issue, file a dispute, like you said. Stop bombing my Talk page though, please. Cheaposgrungy1 (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You're a WP:SOCK eh? Anyway, keep edit-warring and you'll get blocked. Alexbrn (talk) 17:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not related to any of the other users. Wikipedia admin could probably verify.
 * Other independent boards though have brought this issue to light--the unnecessarily negative slant on this article. Obviously, it needs a complete rewrite to establish the NPOV that you discussed previously.
 * It has been a suggested that a "troll army" (possibly those with a hidden agenda) has been safeguarding it for several years, while many others have been trying to restore its objectivity continuously. I want to help the latter, because I believe in Wikipedia's integrity, despite this article's evidence to the contrary. Cheaposgrungy1 (talk) 17:11, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * "Other independent boards" &larr; doubtful. Maybe some fad diet fansite? Link? Alexbrn (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Try Google, troll.
 * https://www.reddit.com/r/Paleo/comments/hpxgb6/why_nobody_is_talking_about_how_the_wikipedia/
 * Honestly, this is just taking too much of my time now, so I am done, you win. BUT-- I am going to be using this situation as an example to friends as to why Wikipedia is NOT reliable. Perhaps this message will spread and one day your efforts will all have been in vain. Cheaposgrungy1 (talk) 17:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, some old off-wiki canvassing, of a depressingly moronic stripe. Explains a lot. Wikipedia follows reliable published sources, not the uninformed views of WP:RANDY. Alexbrn (talk) 17:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)