User talk:Cheatasp

Welcome!

Hello, Cheatasp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Khim Socheat, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! bonadea contributions talk 07:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Khim Socheat


A tag has been placed on Khim Socheat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 07:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Khim Socheat
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Khim Socheat, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Khim Socheat. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:49, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Khim Socheat. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Khim Socheat. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:52, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Khim Socheat, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Khim socheat


A tag has been placed on Khim socheat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 09:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Khim socheat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. andy (talk) 09:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)