User talk:Chebsum

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Dominic Hardstaff (talk) 07:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

The link is provided to an online resource with free media of every imaginable kind, all on the topic of happiness. Kindly suggest an appropriate way to include it in the article. Chang Chebsum

Menngagde
Please explain the removal of the link to translations of the Menngagde texts. These are the only published version of the texts this is extant. It is a formidable work of tremendous benefit to many people. The current Menngagde article is all hearsay and intellectual interpretation with no reference to an opportunity to directly experience the actual texts. Kindly suggest an appropriate format with the page for inclusion of such a link. Chang Chebsum

Spare Philosophy
Although you appear to have added references to the article none are inline. Please use inline citations in the article. Tentontunic (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Spare Philosophy for deletion
The article Spare Philosophy is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Spare Philosophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tentontunic (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)