User talk:Checker Fred/Archive 1

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Checker Fred! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Ajbpearce (talk) 21:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC) A minor thing, you may want to remove your twinkle administrator userbox as you are not an admin, some people who care about that kind of thing will probably moan at you otherwiseAjbpearce (talk) 21:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Fetch season 6
I would like to know if there is certain time frame to add things. I want to add season 6 to the fetch page and episode page, but it won't air in till 2011. The season is going into production this summer. Can you tell me if it is a good idea to add this now or when will be a good time. ThanksChecker Fred (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably best to wait until there is no speculation, per WP:CRYSTAL.  fetch  comms  ☛ 21:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Like Fetchcomms said... Still, if you have information that can be verified by a reliable source and it is notable event, add it... WP:CRYSTAL that Fetch told you to read is a great place. Read it.  Ilyushka88  Talk to me 21:43, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I was Just going to get the point chart, episode chart, Production status up and not add anything into it. Take a look at season 5 to see what I meanChecker Fred (talk) 21:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Which article are you talking about? -- The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 22:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Blue question mark.svg If you require any further assistance, please join the editors on IRC by clicking here. Please insure you join the "#wikipedia-en-help." This is the default channel. -- The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 22:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * list of fetch with ruff ruffman episodes and Fetch with ruff ruffman pageChecker Fred (talk) 22:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Copy the code from an earlier season and change the values to zero. That should be fine. -- The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 22:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Can you tell me why the series overview won't link to season 6 on thefetch with ruff ruffman episodes and fetch pageChecker Fred (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * All fixed. See this diff. -- The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 23:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Good faith edit
You're right, the edit was good faith. It was a vandalism revert like most of my other edits to these articles. Cannonbolt2 (talk) 02:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

iCarly
Okay I moved the pages iCarly: iSaved Your Life and iCarly: iQuite iCarly but it will not lowercase The i in the shows name. Is there as special way to do This thanks.Checker Fred (talk) 17:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed. How to do it is explained at Naming conventions (technical restrictions). JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Coutureslimdown
Can you please unprotect Coutureslimdown. We are new to wikipedia and have been trying to figure things out. We have far more references for her and credentials allow us more time. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by GamesPlay (talk • contribs) 22:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I looked at Coutureslimdown and this user is not blocked. Also I am not an admid.Checker Fred (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

If Tosh.0 says they want you to go leave remarks on their page, why is it protected? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.107.208 (talk) 06:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, this pages is not protected or blocked. I am not an [/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrator]. You can ask one. I can help but I can not protect or block pages. I have not even requested for that page to be protected of blocked. If it was blocked or protected it have might have expired. Checker Fred (talk) 20:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

WP:SPI
Just in case you haven't been watching the page, I suppose it's proper to make sure you are aware that your edits to WP:RPP and Sockpuppet investigations/Simulation12 have kind of backfired on you and now it is very likely that you will be blocked as a block-evading sockpuppet. If you have anything to say in your defense, now is the time. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

pictures
I would like to add a image for the show Fetch with ruff ruffman page. How do I do this thanksChecker Fred (talk) 21:10, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If you want to add an existing image to an article, add  to the area of the article where you want the image to appear – replacing   with the actual file name of the image, and   with a short description of the image. See our picture tutorial for more information.
 * If you want to upload an image from your computer for use in an article, you must find out what the proper license of the image is. If you know the image is licensed under a free-license, upload it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of here, so that all projects have access to the image (sign up). If you are unsure what license the image takes, see the file upload wizard for more information. Please also read Wikipedia's image use policy. I hope this helps.
 * Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks!  --Mysdaao talk 21:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks!  --Mysdaao talk 21:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

episodes
I want to add a third row of episode # for iCarly. I did an example on the talk page but it does not seem to be working. Here's what I did.

Season 2: 2008-2009

did I do something wrong thanksChecker Fred (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Sort of... You can't just make new fields for a template. You would have to go and alter the template first (and check that it does not screw up other Articles - best to discuss on the template talk page.  The one you used (Template:Episode list) does not have a "EpisodeNumber3" field.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Fred,


 * You want to add |ProdCode=   in the place of  |EpisodeNumber3=  and that will put the Production code number under the heading on the far right of the table.  delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 21:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Striking what i wrote above as I mis-read the headings that you have on the table. There actually is no way to add a third column of episode numbering before the title of the episode. delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 21:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If there really is a need for three columns of episode numbering you could forgo use of templates and manually code the table. It is a more complicated but it would allow you the freedom to assign columns in the order you wish to as well as your choice of sizing. If you wish to see an example see The Brotherhood of Poland, New Hampshire where i chose to code it manually with a slightly different style.
 * In my opinion the List of iCarly episodes does convey the information that i believe you are wanting to include. If you do redesign the list you would need to do it for each season for continuity of design. And i see that you have raised this issue on the talk page for the list of episodes so i will shut up now :P  delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 22:25, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. As I have already pointed out to you when you raised this previously on my talk page, other editors did not'' say it was fine. The first person said it was "probably best to wait until there is no speculation, per WP:CRYSTAL and the second agreed. You can read this for yourself above.'' AussieLegend (talk) 12:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been told time and time again not to add uncited information to articles. If it can't be verified by citations from reliable sources it shouldn't be in the article. Continuing to re-add the information is inappropriate and if you persist, you may be blocked. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of iCarly episodes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Jac 16888 Talk 18:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Since you're already broken the 3RR I could well block you right now, however you've got one chance. Stop reverting, stop labelling the other guys edits as vandalism when they're not and start discussing-- Jac 16888 Talk 19:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit War
The format of lists of episodes, if they have color, should always have the same colors. In other words, every list of episodes should be the same. Just look: List of Little People, Big World episodes, List of Jon & Kate Plus 8 episodes. They're all the same. Mr. Prez (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

take a look at your talk pageChecker Fred (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, some articles out there on Wikipedia may be set up wrong as well. The correct order of colors are: C80815 for season 1, F86FB4 for season 2, 6699CC for season 3 etc. Mr. Prez (talk) 19:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Where does it say there is a certain order for episode colors. Also they colors that you put look not so great.Checker Fred (talk) 19:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * First of all, Wikipedia is not about what looks good. And you're right, there isn't any place where it says a specific order of colors needs to be used. But, if you look at certain things of the same topic, you'll realize that they're all similar, especially in color. For example, the Ashley Tisdale, Demi Lovato, and Justin Bieber templates are all the same color, due to the fact that all three of those people are solo singers. Mr. Prez (talk) 19:36, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

iCarly is using (Template:Episode list) for the episodes on the page. Many pages follow different formats as longs as it meets the standards for the page. You may change the page only if you can find a way to work in 3 episode #. hgere's what it could look like Season 2: 2008-2009 but the only problem is that the format they are using for this list is that the do not allow 3 sections of episodes. You can redisgn the page to make this wok and go a head and use these colors. What I did not did not notice at the same time is that you still kept the info the same. But make sure iBloop, iPsycho, iBeat the Heat, and iWon't Cancel The Show are marked out of the page when you save but still there when you go and edit the page. This will be moved up when the episodes are more confirmed. also make sure the production codes are still there because some of the episodes are counted as two episodes.Checker Fred (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, by the way, I only was telling you off in the beginning because I didn't know I could undo edits easily, sorry about that. Mr. Prez (talk) 19:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Warning: Potentially violating the three-revert rule on List of iCarly episodes.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. - Zhang He (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Fetchlogo ruff vm.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Fetchlogo ruff vm.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. AussieLegend (talk) 09:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

I got this image from a google search and it dircts from the pbskids site, where do I add this in. I think I figured this out. Checker Fred (talk) 11:40, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * As indicated by the template, you need to add an appropriate image copyright template. More information is available at Image copyright tags, also as indicated by the template. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Broadcast history
Things like syndication and stuff need to be cited. I have tagged the Suite Life section. Please point out any others to me. Ω pho  is  18:59, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright warning: List of The Middle episodes
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  The left orium  22:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

FETCH Season 3
Checker fred Sammy's last name is Boucher not Schmitt. --FetchFan21 (talk) 22:02, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Just leave it for now in till i find out moreChecker Fred (talk) 22:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

iCarly
While they are on the website, you would need either a direct URL to the episode info, or the general link with instructions on how to find the information on the website. Once it is taken down, though, you may have to remove the episodes unless another reliable source can be found since blog websites are generally not considered RS. Ω pho  is  22:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

FETCH Season 5
About Shreya's last name I found her last name on Facebook I found her in Ruff's friends. --FetchFan21 (talk) 20:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
It may not have been your intention, but you recently reverted an apparently constructive edit on Bob the Builder. Please be careful not to undo the efforts of others to improve articles without good reason, which should be stated in the edit summary. Thank you. -- Smjg (talk) 00:14, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bob the Builder. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -- Smjg (talk) 08:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Episode #
Okay This has been going on for mounths now. The list of iCarly episode # are a little bit of a mess. There are a total of 70 episodes produced for the series so far. Season 1 has 25 episodes, season 2 has 25 episodes and season 3 has twenty episodes. iDate a Bad Boy 217/225, iFight Shelby Marx 221-222, iQuit iCarly 233-234, and iPhyco 243-244 [when it gets put up, hidden right now] are counted as 2 episodes iGo to Japan is counted as 3 episodes. now this is if the episodes aired seperatly. now wheh the final 2 air for the season the count is going to go up to 63 or 64 episodes but it does not show that it is going to be 70 episodes. This issue as been brought up on the talk page many times but the issue has not been solved. in the Series Overview box it says season two has 25 episodes and if you look on the episode list it goes to 20. Also for season 3 it says 20 episodes but when all the episodes are put in it will go up to 18. Is there a wat to get this solved not on the talk page by several people quicker. The page has been protected several times because of this issue. Page protetion will be done for it's 9th time in two weeks. So is there a way to solve this issue much quicker then trying to wait for responses before protecton ends or is there a way to extend protection intill this is solved. The fourth season is scheluded to start production soon and is most likely going to have the same problem. I have also brought this as a task on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Nickelodeon. Please tell me what the next step is for this page. Checker Fred (talk) 23:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)


 * 9 protections in two weeks?! If it's that bad of a dispute, maybe the dispute resolution process is worth attempting. I'm not sure...if this is something that's been fought over on the talk page without any results, then for sure go for dispute resolution. If it's actually had some progress made on the talk page, then it may be worth attempting to continue discussing first. Ks0stm  If you reply here, please leave me a  message on my talk page. 00:45, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

9 protections over 1 year or so, sorry if I confused you may be I will try the dispute and see what happensChecker Fred (talk) 00:54, 15 May 2010 (UTC)


 * OK then. I've cancelled the helpme for now; I suggest starting a new section here, stating clearly and succinctly what changes you think should be made - and then invite others to state whether they agree to them or not. You could notify major contributors to the article on their talk pages, and additionally ask on the talk pages of relevant project groups. Hopefully by doing that, you'll be able to show a clear consensus here to make a specific edit, and then it can be done with no problem at all. Stick to simple suggestions, backed by reliable sources and wikipedia policy/guidelines; it might be easier to work on one simple uncontroversial set of changes at first. Best of luck; if you need more help with any of it, please ask again with another helpme on your own talk page, keeping the article discussion page for the actual content discussion. Best of luck,  Chzz  ►  01:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

okay it's figured out. I did not even think of it. tthanksChecker Fred (talk) 10:43, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

show fax
iCalry is going to be starting production for it's 4th season soon. One of the episodes have been revealed I Got A Hot Room. but soon the source will take away the episode http://www.showfax.com/type_selection.cfm?l=1&c=icarly after a few weeks. so how would I add the episodes to the iCarly list and not get it taken down. is there a way to do this. Also i know blogs are not a RS but the person who runs the site http://iicarlyy.blogspot.com gets the episodes from show fax as well. /Checker Fred (talk) 23:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * It is possible to make permanent links to show older websites using the Wayback Machine, or WebCite, although you do need to sign up to use that service.


 * See Linkrot.  Chzz  ►  23:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Be careful
Be sure what you call "vandalism" is really vandalism. this edit was not. This is a content dispute. Note that calling edits vandalism when they are not can border on being a personal attack. Please resolve this dispute with the editors rather than continuing to revert. Thanks, Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 23:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Unprotection
Sorry about that ICarly note, it went on the wrong section as the section moved when I edited another one. However the list of episodes that wanted unprotected should get the opinion of User talk:AnmaFinotera. Non admins can still know why a page is protected. I am basing this on the comment added when the page was protected, which says to contact one of two people first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:11, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

redirect
okay I have created http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_PBSKids but when you go to the add new member section it goes here to add new ones http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_PBS_Kids/Members&action=edit but then won't show up in the redirect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_PBS_Kids/Members. I have tested it with an ip and it did not work. so what happing that it won't show up and edit in the right section.Checker Fred (talk) 21:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


 * It looks like the "add your name" link should be changed from WikiProject PBS Kids/Members to WikiProject PBSKids/Members to avoid the redirect issue.


 * On a more general note, I urge you to keep in mind the "Keep markup simple" guidelines in the Manual of Style. The code on the WikiProject PBSKids page is sufficiently complex that it's hard to tell at a glance what's going on, and it's not clear how much is gained by tweaking the Wikipedia style this way.  I think this error would be more easily caught if the style was kept simpler. Tim Pierce (talk) 22:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

invitations
okay I created the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PBSKids_invitation but when I preview it does not show up. I put this up and

and nothings showing up. Iam I doing something wrog or what do I whave to do. I am trying to make the one like th tv invatition.Checker Fred (talk) 20:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.  — fetch ·  comms   20:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

iCarly
You reverted the "tween" reference, but can we leave the link to the wiki? I've explained why on Talk:ICarly. Thank you. -- Confession0791 (talk) 21:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Reason I undid your edits
There was a person who put useless stuff on the List of Phineas and Ferb Episodes page, so when you reverted it back to DJHerbie53's version, it came back, so I undid it, but you reverted it back, but with the vandalism, it was needed I reverted it back so there is no vandalism on the page. I am sorry for what I had done. 69.228.89.220 (talk) 22:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

And here is the reason why i undid it:

The boys build tree-houses for themselves and Candace with a little help from Heffer; Dr. Doofenshmirtz plans to use brainwashed pigeons to destroy a celebration in honor of his brother. But in the end, Rocko grabs a waterball from the girls and hit them really hard.

Rocko and Heffer are not from Phineas and Ferb, they are from Rocko's Modern Life. The bolded part is the reason I had to undo your edits. 69.228.89.220 (talk) 23:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Okay For Rocko and Heffer I don't know what your talking about. I reverted to to this version. The main reason it was reverted wasa because of lack of support. The episode you put on my page is most likey a season 2 episode. I reverted manny edits before the one you reverted. As far as the vandlism I made as mistake and hit that one instead of good faith.Checker Fred (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

The episode that was in question for the vandalism was Tree to Get Ready, a Season 1 episode. By the way, I am still 69.228.89.220, but with a user name. Isabella and Lego Liker (talk) 00:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
When adding links to material on an external site, as you did to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
 * If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
 * If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. AussieLegend (talk) 16:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bidgee (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:AussieLegend has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 17:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:AussieLegend. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. ''The reversion made at List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes had nothing to do with WP:AGF. The video that you linked to was a copyrighted work uploaded to Youtube by a fan. As such your addition was a clear LINKVIO and the removal was both appropriate and required.'' AussieLegend (talk) 17:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash;Kww(talk) 17:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Reverting an another's edits
Uh, why did you revert the season 3 part for the List of Phineas and Ferb Episodes page when there was a source on it? Disney confirmed it a year ago, so it should stay there, not be knocked out. The view may think that the show may end at the 2nd season and not watch at all if that was true. Reason for it? Isabella and Lego Liker Whatcha doin'? 18:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

it did not start yet or any other mention of the new season at this time. So it is removed intill more is found out about season 3.Checker Fred (talk) 19:00, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

List of FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman characters images
The images that you added to List of FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman characters were not added in accordance with several of Wikipedia's policies including, bot not limited to, MOS:IMAGE, WP:IUP, Manual of Style (layout), WP:NFC and WP:NFCC. I have edited the article so as to correct the numerous issues that existed. Generally, images should be right aligned to avoid breaking text flow, forced image sizes should not be used unless there is good reason to do so, captions should be used and non-free content should be used minimally and for specific purposes. I removed one image because it breached WP:NFCC, specifically because "its presence would [not] significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would [not] be detrimental to that understanding." I have added caption to all images. However, the captions on the images of the cast are only basic and the image does not sufficiently meet the requirements of WP:NFCC. To do so, the captions must identify the individual cast members. Failure to provide appropriate captions may result in these images being removed from the article. On a related note, File:Dan directing.jpg was removed from Dan Schneider (TV producer), and will be again (I notice that you've reverted!) because non-free images are not used in BLPs. WP:NFCC requires states, "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." Free images of individuals are availble or may be created so there is never an excuse to use non-free images in BLPs. Please do not edit war over these changes, they are being made in accordance with policies that you are required to comply with if you wish to continue editing Wikipedia. You have already breache WP:3RR today. It would not be in your best interests to do so again. --AussieLegend (talk) 20:01, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


 * what was wrong with the fetch 300 pic. Does it need to be a pic that just shows it and not ruff. If that is the case there really is none out there.Checker Fred (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Primarily the problem is that the main focus of the image seems to be Ruff, not the Fetch 300. --AussieLegend (talk) 20:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Big red error messages
When you cause a big red error message, as you did here, it's a good practice to either revert your own change or continue with your fix.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Please use the preview button
Your latest edit is not only of completely inappropriate content (note that whenever you type "TBA", you are probably making a bad edit), you made half the article disappear by corrupting the table format. Use the preview button, correct your edits until you don't completely damage the article, and then press save.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I am just adding season 4 into the article, once I save it gives me the air message. also I am not even doing anything with the other seasons I am just coping the format. I did use the preview and it comes in red still it says I move out has a problem and I don't even see it. what I am doing wrong then. It is not doing this when the ip's are adding incorrect season 4 informationChecker Fred (talk) 15:55, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * With your references, you deleted a for no apparent reason that I can see: there are two back-to-back references there. Your syntax problem with Season 4 is an unclosed comment. If the content belonged in the article, I probably would have fixed it for you. Since the content does not belong in the article, because you have not provided any reliable sourcing, I reverted it. Please do not add this particular change back in until you have a real source.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:02, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

question
I was wondering is there a say to send messages to a lot of users at once. I am trying to promote the pbskids wiki project.Checker Fred (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You might like to look into WP:AWB, which requires you to download something and need admin approval. The trouble is that sending unsolicited messages to large numbers of editors might not be looked upon too kindly. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:38, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Jim Conroy
Why would the Jim Conroy article ever be deleted? Sure, I started it, but it's now owned by the commons. The level of detail and information within the article is directly related to the popularity of the actor and the information that is available on him. Are you hoping that I will do something about it? If grammar needs to be corrected, by all means have at it. --BKalesti (talk) 04:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dan directing.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dan directing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fetch 300.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fetch 300.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes and June 18, 2010
This date is not mentioned at the source you provided here. The hidden comment that you deleted is quite explicit, the citation must directly support the date. ie if I, or anyone else, clicks on the citation they should see "June 18, 2010" at the source provided. It's not there. --AussieLegend (talk) 00:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

MSN is a reliable source. Attempting to comment out cited content, as you unsuccessfully did here is inappropriate. If your attempt was based on a belief that these episodes are part of season 3, the problem is that we still do not have a cited date for the last episode of season 2 so we have to treat episodes as if they were part of season 2. Once we have a cited date, we can move these episodes to season 3. You should note that your edits left the article in a mess. If your edits don't work, revert them, don't simply leave the article as you did. It can be considered vandalism. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Could you please familiarise yourself with Identifying reliable sources, Copyrights and External links? External links states that "Links to blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority are links normally to be avoided. This edit added a citation from disneydreaming.com. That site states quite clearly at the bottom of the home page, "DisneyDreaming.com is a Fan Site and is Not A ©Disney Company and does not claim to be." Accordingly, it's not a reliable source and can not be used to support your date. Additionally, the video linked to from the website is a breach of copyright and can not be linked to as indicated at Copyrights. Perhaps it would be better to leave the date as TBA until such time as the episode has aired or, if you find what you think is an appropriate citation, seek advice on the article's talk page before adding it to the article. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Mrs. Gibson
On the List of iCarly characters page, there are two actresses listed as playing her role, but no evidence to back it up. Could you look into this? Confession0791 (talk) 22:57, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

okay, I not realy sure but I think two different people played her in the series. you would have to check the episodes and see. either imdb or look at the credits.Checker Fred (talk) 23:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

FETCH! with Ruff Ruffman
This sort of thing is exactly why I told you earlier that WP:CRYSTAL information should not be included in articles. --AussieLegend (talk) 01:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

well I knew it was a pretty strong show and didn't think WGBH would do that. Have the auditions then cancele it.Checker Fred (talk) 11:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * It happens all the time. That's why we require strong citations from reliable sources for content added to articles. --AussieLegend (talk) 11:12, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Need so some help
Hey Checker, I was wondering if you can direct to a website that has information on TV production codes? Specifically to improve the Victorious episode list. QuasyBoy (talk) 14:58, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

don't know if this site will work http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?PAGE=sbSearch&SEQ=20100617111040&PID=gzG25dmrPLsyqDM_kwb-zIKALoXa. I know it works of a few iCarly episodes. well I am really not sure where else you can find the now since the show is done filming new episodes. itunes has a function (don't know if it works) looks like you have to be logged in. go get info
 * First, put Victorious in the search engine
 * Next, pick the season you would want to find the production code for
 * Pick the episode you want
 * Right click on the episode
 * Click on video at the top, when a little screan pops up
 * Finnally, you should see episode id.

it is mostly current episodes that have aired. Were trying something different for iCarly season 4 this time. so maybe do showfax for season 2 when production begins. Checker Fred (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The iTunes thing doesn't seem be working for me. I know I'll actually get it if I buy the episode. Where you able to get the prod codes from iTunes without buying episodes? QuasyBoy (talk) 15:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

yes I was able to get them without buying.Checker Fred (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That's what I'm trying to do, But it's not working for me. When the preview video for the episode streams, all it shows is the show and episode title. QuasyBoy (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea what's going on then.Checker Fred (talk) 15:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks anyway. :) QuasyBoy (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

TSLOD Episodes
Isn't "Breakup in Paris" the season finale? Where did all these other episodes come from? -ElaineBenes
 * yes it is. the other ones are in season 3.Checker Fred (talk) 11:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Then shouldn't they make a season 3 section? - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.6.76 (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

they will be after the episode airs and put it into season 3Checker Fred (talk) 14:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * That doesnt make sense - ElaineBenes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.6.76 (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

another user dosn't want season 3 up yet untill it is more confirmed. Also does think Break up in pairs is the season finaly. Even though it is confimed by the promo. So he wants everyone to leave it the way it is and put the season 3 section up when it rolls around and is confirmed and is saying we treat those episoes as season 2 episodes even though they are season 3 episodes. Bascially he is being a pain in the neck. it is user AussieLegend. Checker Fred (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Then why not just leave the other episodes out for now? Why should one user decide how the page should look? I had problems with this user as well - ElaineBenes


 * i don't know You can take them out if you wantChecker Fred (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * You can take them out but as they're cited episodes, they'll go back in. It's not me being the pain in the neck, it's the people who think we can constantly ignore policy and use unreliable sources. We can't. --AussieLegend (talk) 23:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC)