User talk:Checker Fred 2.0

March 2019

 * This block is unrelated to who edits which articles. More interesting is your relationship to User:Checker Fred, and why you were editing from exactly the same places as both Simulation12 and CaptainDanger25, as well as some other abusive accounts. And User:CaptainDanger25 can also read this. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * My relation to CaptainDanger25 is just my co-admin on the Henry Danger wiki, he suggested that I come here and create an account on Wikipedia, since I was complaining that Last Man Standing didn't have serrate episode pages. I was going to name my account Checker Fred, but saw that was taken, so I added the 2.0 part.
 * My relation to CaptainDanger25 is just my co-admin on the Henry Danger wiki, he suggested that I come here and create an account on Wikipedia, since I was complaining that Last Man Standing didn't have serrate episode pages. I was going to name my account Checker Fred, but saw that was taken, so I added the 2.0 part.

Checker Fred 2.0 (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * For the person attacking CaptainDanger25, that is a user on our Henry Danger wiki and several other wiki's as we saw noticed two of the same accounts Benedictfoos and FullerHouseFan01. They are socks of each other and were blocked for blanking pages then later attacking Bigteddy1 on there. They somehow managed to gain control of his account here. Other then knowing each other on the Henry Danger wiki, I didn't use his computer to create my account as we live in two different states. This is the only account I created here. May I ask how this account came to your attention? What pages have me and CaptainDanger25 exactly edited that are the same with Simulation12 besides the draft pages? Are you able to open a sock case to prove that were are socks of each other?

CaptainDanger25 wants me to ask you why you are bring this up now when before you said he wasn't a sock of simulation12Checker Fred 2.0 (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.