User talk:Cheekychops

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! :) Dlohcierekim 13:07, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Harry Dennison tagged for speedy deletion
An article that you have been involved in editing, Harry Dennison, has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :) Dlohcierekim 13:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Human Traffic
I reverted your edits to Human Traffic - neither wikipedia nor imdb has an entry on "Loved up Fucked up", and google gives only one result for the phrase, which doesn't refer to the film. Wikipedia is only for verifiable assertions - have a look at Verifiability. --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 21:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * No problem - seems rather strange though Danny Dyer who stars in Human Traffic mentions LOVED UP in this months Attitude magazine. It is not listed at IM database because as I stated the film was witrhdarwn and the database only covers released material.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cheekychops (talk • contribs) 08:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC).


 * That would count as a valid source, I think. Have a read of Citing sources, then edit the article again.  --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 10:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * ...yup, that would seem to do the trick. Good work.  --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 23:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, do you know the date of the magazine? I think we need to cite it in the article.  --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 14:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

It was the June edition  June 2006 - I have done other edits whgich have gone through over the last year and have not been asked whiche edition just for the record.

Hi, I've reverted your changes to this entry as articles in both the Sunday Times and the Manchester Evening News state differently. Are you sure you have the right actor?

Yes I have the right actor - it was in November edition of Attitude and will scan later. A magazine with photo and inyterview with the actor does pave better than a snippet in a local Mancheter newspaper

Hollins
I'd like to ask that you refrain from editing the article on Chris Hollins again, thank you. We've received a complaint. DS 14:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please supply details of this complaint.

Block warning
Per WP:BIO it is inappropriate to speculate about the personal lives of living people without a full citation to support the claim. You have edited a large number of biographies to insinuate a romantic relationship with a casting director named Lee Denison, to the point where WP:VANDAL and WP:POINT become an issue. If this continues you will be blocked from editing. Durova Charg e! 03:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Please supply details of this complaint.

Okay, that's enough. Hollis, Maskall, James-Collier, three strikes and you're out. Goodbye. DS 21:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Still no details of complaint as requested, two strikes and you're out...obviously.

Article: Mark Anstee
==Proposed deletion of Mark Anstee== A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Anstee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? blahblax (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC)