User talk:Cheerioswithmilk

In response to your feedback
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I too feel a sense of accomplishment every time I help to make Wikipedia a better place. If you find that you need any help or have questions, you might want to stop by the Teahouse where new users can ask questions to experience editors in a comfortable and non-threatening environment. You also might want to check out the help desk or browse the help pages. Cheers!

Topher385 (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Scientific method
Hello CWM. I reverted your edits to the Scientific method article for two reasons. 1. The citation you provided did not support the first part of the edit (e.g., the first sentence) and 2. the citation supported the idea that scientists do not follow the scientific method, rather than a criticism of the method itself. (The source you provided is indeed interesting!) Given the fact that this particular article deserves rigorous and precise editing (simply because of its subject matter), I invite and encourage you to take another stab at it, but please do so with a pen-knife and not a saber. Happy editing.--S. Rich (talk) 04:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dione (moon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voyager (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

OER inquiry
Hi, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Cheerioswithmilk/Minerva Project


A tag has been placed on User:Cheerioswithmilk/Minerva Project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Legacypac (talk) 02:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)