User talk:Cheeseandaqtr

Speedy deletion nomination of John Riley Ellis
Hello Cheeseandaqtr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Riley Ellis for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Itsalleasy (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mel Weyant


A tag has been placed on Mel Weyant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 15:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Peanuts, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Güyük Khan with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 15:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Charlie Brown with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 16:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)