User talk:Cheesypenguigi

December 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 03:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

i understand, i guess i will edit wiktionary instead. thank you! Cheesypenguigi (talk) 01:25, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

There's no chance anyone will unblock you without a topic ban around romanisations. You have demonstrated you are not capable of editing constructively in that area. Frankly, though, it's hard to see how you'll convince another administrator that you'd edit constructively even in a different area, given your past editing. --Yamla (talk) 10:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
Would unblock with topic ban around romanisations. Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:42, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No CU data to indicate block evasion. The blocking admin is . I'm not sure this is a great candidate for unblocking but hey, I don't object due to WP:AGF. May be worth unblocking them and seeing how their edits play out. --Yamla (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Topic ban is a must, I think. Their request is contradictory, saying "my English language proficiency is not good enough to correct spelling and grammar mistakes here" and then saying that they will "I will correct spelling or grammar mistakes here that I find". 331dot (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I will agree that my latest request is contradictory, but I was simply replying to the previous decline reason, which states "Your English language proficiency is not good enough to correct spelling and grammar mistakes here."
 * Sorry for any confusion. Cheesypenguigi (talk) 14:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
OL to unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

(after Ec) Unblocked per your Wiktionary edits. I have no idea whether your earlier Romanisation edits are or are not correct; I just didn't trust them due to the Engadine edit so I wholesale reverted them. I think it's worth giving you one more chance due to the passage of time. Graham87 (talk) 03:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Graham87. Cheesypenguigi (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)