User talk:Cheick-Didier

July 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Despicable Me (franchise), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Zootopia. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. WP:SEAOFBLUE discourages wikilinking several words in a row, as the reader won't be sure what they're clicking on. McGeddon (talk) 09:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Zootopia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  McDoob AU93  18:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Zootopia, you may be blocked from editing.  McDoob AU93  18:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Original research
Please do not add your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shrek Forever After. You've been warned for this before. If you don't understand policy, please ask at WP:TEAHOUSE or WP:HELPDESK. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
I'm not sure what you were trying to do in this edit to Shrek Forever After, but you broke the link to the director of the film and completely changed the meaning of one sentence. In the future, I strongly suggest that you provide edit summaries for your edits. Otherwise, we're left to guess at your intent—and with an edit like the one I linked above, it's just as easy to view it as disruptive as to view it as an attempt to improve the article. —C.Fred (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Shrek 2. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not blank citations or restore synthesis, such as saying that a film received positive reviews without a source that explicitly says this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

April 2018
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Star (TV series). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:03, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2018 (UTC)