User talk:Chelsea1347311

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 03:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Eye snore  (pending changes) 03:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Taiwan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source, and CANNOT be used to cite text! GotR Talk 04:27, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Sourcing
Wikipedia in any language can not be used as a source. Please stop readding the same thing to the article when your additions have been reverted. Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 04:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi
I'd take those warnings seriously (see above). Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 04:36, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 04:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
Since you resumed your editing pattern immediately on being unblocked, I have blocked you indefinitely. This does not mean forever; it simply means, you are blocked until you decide to respond to the concerns made about your edit (and it really is just one edit, repeated many times) on your talk page. Please respond to this. --Golbez (talk) 07:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC)